Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Cromwell Schubarth’

Jan 6, 2014, 7:38am PST

Series A funding crunch be damned, VCs say full speed ahead!

500 Startups, led by co-founder Dave McClure, was the most active VC seed investor again in 2013, according to a new report from CB Insights.

Senior Technology Reporter- Silicon Valley Business Journal

Seed funding by venture capital firms hit a four-year high in 2013, according to a new report, despite growing concerns about pending Series A financing crunch.

There was $893 million invested in 843 seed deals last year, according to funding research firm CB Insights, the most since 2009.

The report only examined the seed rounds that included funding from venture firms, a growing proportion of total startup funding over the past four years.

The surge in seed funding by VCs comes despite concerns that a swelling number of startups won’t be able to attract later stage money from venture firms when they need Series A funding to grow.

The top three seed venture investors were the same as in 2012, with 500 Startups repeating at No. 1. Andreessen Horowitz moved up to No. 2 and SV Angel dropped to No. 3.

The number of VC firms actively investing in seed rounds remained level at 112, but that is nearly double the number from 2012 and almost triple the 2011 tally.

The amount of seed financing by VCs in 2013 was 22 percent higher than in 2012 and 74 percent higher than in 2011. Last year’s third quarter was the biggest in this time span, with $257 million invested across 253 unique funding deals.

The average amount invested in each deal in the fourth quarter of 2013 was $1.5 million, up 50 percent over the last four years. The median was up nearly two-thirds in that same time.

The number of seed funding deals more than doubled in two startup sectors: education/training and human relations/work force management. Funding also more than doubled in those two sectors, as well as for startups in the payments business.

The biggest declines were in photography, gaming and news.

Click here to read CB Insights blog about seed funding by venture firms in 2013 and here to see its blog about who the top VC seed investors are.

Cromwell Schubarth is the Senior Technology Reporter at the Business Journal. His phone number is 408.299.1823.

Read Full Post »

Silicon Valley VC hottest since crash; Meet No. 1 investors by sector

Venture investing in Silicon Valley hit its highest level since the 2009 financial crisis, a new report from CB Insights shows. Click through the photo gallery to see who the top investors in the hottest trends are.

Senior Technology Reporter- Silicon Valley Business Journal
Big Data, mobile, digital health and the Internet of Things are a few of the hottest trends in Silicon Valley these days and a new report shows who the biggest investors in those sectors are.

The Silicon Valley Venture Capital Almanac, which compares VC and angel investments in the region since 2009, shows data and Internet technology investments are dominating in the region today where the sector once shared top billing with health and cleantech.

“There used to be three main areas that the Valley dominated in, but cleantech and health have given way and tech investing is by far No. 1 today,” according to Anand Sanwal, CEO of CB Insights. His research firm wrote the report for Silicon Valley Bank, Orrick and GLG Share.

The number of deals and dollars in the third quarter were the highest they have been since the financial crisis of 2009, with 267 fundings and $2.8 billion invested here, the report also shows.

Here is a look at who the almanac says are the big dogs in the hottest trends in tech investing in the region. All of the totals are based on the number of funding deals they have done since 2009. Click through the accompanying photo gallery for more detail:

Most active in Internet deals: SV Angel, 111.

Most active in mobile deals: SV Angel, 41.

Most active in ad tech deals: 500 Startups, 15.

Most active in Big Data deals: Lightspeed Venture Partners, Khosla Ventures, tied with 11 each.

Most active in finance tech deals: Andreessen Horowitz, Google Ventures, tied with 9 each.

Most active in digital health deals: Felicis Ventures, 7.

Most active in Internet of things deals: Intel Capital, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, tied with 5 each.

Here is a look at who the most active overall investors have been since 2009:

Most active investor: SV Angel, 156 deals.

Most active corporate VC: Google Ventures, 89 deals.

Most active seed investor: 500 Startups, 106 deals.

Most active late stage investor: Sequoia Capital, 26 deals.

Click here to see the Silicon Valley Venture Capital Almanac online.

Read Full Post »

AngelList’s Ravikant makes urgent plea for changes in new crowdfunding rules

Vicki Thompson

Naval Ravikant grew AngelList into the world’s™s foremost meeting place for founders and funders. Now he is laying plans to broaden its mission and make money.

Senior Technology Reporter- Silicon Valley Business Journal

AngelList co-founder and CEO Naval Ravikant sees potential disaster in proposed new crowdfunding regulations and is urging others on his founders and funders networking site to speak up.

In a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission this week and an interview with me on Friday, Ravikant warned that the agency’s new Form D filing rules set to take effect on Sept. 23 could bring “disastrous unintended consequences for the startup community,”

“The proposed rules appear to be tailored to how Wall Street raises funds, not the startup community,”Ravikant said in his letter.

“My sense is that the SEC knows that this is an issue and is not going to put into effect some of these rules,” he told me in an interview late on Friday.

The agency last month voted to allow startups and private investment groups to openly solicit money, with restrictions that Ravikant and others in the angel investor community are very unhappy about. Ravikant’s letter was sent when the agency solicited feedback before enacting the new rules.

One of Ravikant’s biggest concerns centers around the proposed penalties. He worries that proposed sanctions may be too draconian, resulting in severe punishment for unintended violations. He notes that violating the rules could result in startups being banned from fundraising for a year and that AngelList could get swept up in those penalties.

“Rules that may be easy for Wall Street are a death sentence for startups. They are easy to break accidentally and the penalty for noncompliance is severe,” Ravikant wrote.

Businesses like AngelList, incubators, and VCs that surround startups are built to avoid getting in the way of a startup’s autonomy, Ravikant wrote. “they should not be penalized for activities that a startup undertakes on their own that the business can’t control.”

He also urges the SEC not to reduce the costs of compliance and keep filings confidential.

“Startups often want to control the timing of their financing announcement and prefer not to reveal amounts raised for competitive reasons,” he wrote. “If more of the Form D information was confidential rather than public, compliance rates would jump dramatically.”

Ravikant proposes that third parties like AngelList be allowed to make SEC filings on behalf of startups and serve as a repository where startups can update information about their fundraising.

The Angel Capital Association, which represents 200 investor groups and 10,000 accredited investors across the country, last month also strongly protested the new rules.

AngelList has 100,000 startups and about 20,000 accredited investors on its platform and Ravikant’s views are quite influential among them.

The new rules are coming to implement the federal JOBS Act, which was passed and signed into law more than a year ago.

They retain the requirement that only accredited investors (those with a liquid net worth of more than $1 million) can make equity investments in private companies. They also require private companies and funds to document that their investors meet that net worth standard.

The new rules also require anybody doing a general solicitation to file a Form D with the SEC at least 15 days before starting their campaign. They must file a followup within 30 days of ending the solicitation.

Ravikant wrote in his letter that the requirements probably won’t hinder startups that can afford the bankers and lawyers that will be needed to comply.

But, he warns that “the same rules applied to early stage startups will prevent them from forming. Since young companies are responsible for most of the job growth in the US, we believe this is against the spirit of the JOBS Act.”

“Startups are constantly raising money, sometimes before they have even hired a lawyer,” Ravikant told me. “With tech startups, it’s all loose-goosie. You raise money as you go, often from friends, family and investors. These companies will trip all over these rules and break them left and right.”

Ravikant’s specific complaints:

1” “The requirement to file a Form D 15 days prior to the financing, or at the close of financing even if a financing doesn’t close, is meaningless in our world. Startups are always financing.”

2” “The requirement to formally file all written materials provided to investors with the SEC is not feasible in a world where the materials are updated continuously.”

3” “The requirement to include disclosures every time you mention a financing doesn’t™t work for most places those appear (try tweeting boilerplate legal text in 140 characters, or requiring reporters to include it in stories).”

4” “These technical legal requirements place burdens on startups at a stage before they may have legal advice, and the very severe penalty for non-compliance (not fundraising for a year) is a death penalty for a not-yet-profitable business.”

Click here to read the profile of Naval Ravikant and AngelList that was the July 26 cover story in the Silicon Valley Business Journal.

Click here to subscribe to TechFlash Silicon Valley, the free daily email newsletter about founders and funders in the region.

Cromwell Schubarth is the Senior Technology Reporter at the Business Journal. His phone number is 408.299.1823.

Read Full Post »

 

Why star VCs matter (and what doesn’t)

Joi Ito / Creative Commons license

Having a big name VC on a firm such as Marc Andreessen matters more to startup founders than being funded by a big name firm, according to a new study.


Senior Technology Reporter- Silicon Valley Business Journal

Startup founders want big-name VCs like a Marc Andreessen or a Reid Hoffman on their side, not no-name firms.

And having women on the team at the firm matters more than funders think.

Those are two of the findings of a big brand study done for the National Venture Capital Association by Desantis Breindel and Rooney & Associates.

An overwhelming majority of founders in the study said VC brand means a lot to who they seek funding from.

But they disagree strongly in key areas about what is most important in that branding.

More than half of the venture-backed CEOs in the study (57 percent) said they care most about the reputation of a firm’s individual partners. Only 38 percent said they focus on the firm’s overall reputation and a mere 5 percent care about the reputation of the firm’s portfolio companies.

The gender gap may be a result of more women founders starting up companies than there are women making partner at VC firms.

One in four founders said the gender makeup of a VC firm mattered to them while only one in 10 VCs said they thought it mattered. But two-thirds of women founders said it matters to them.

Other findings of the brand study include:

— Proximity matters: About half of both founders and funders said that being located near their funders mattered to them, with about the same number saying that firms located in Silicon Valley, Boston and New York City are most attractive.

— Friendly but not too much: CEOs said they want a VC firm that is entrepreneur-friendly and collaborative but they are turned off if the firms have too much of a hands-on reputation.

— Peer networking: CEOs said the most important activity that VC firms can provide is a summit or meeting where they can learn from other founders.

Click here to read more about the National Venture Capital Association branding study.

Click here to subscribe to TechFlash Silicon Valley, the free daily email newsletter about the region’s founders and funders.

Cromwell Schubarth is the Senior Technology Reporter at the Business Journal. His phone number is 408.299.1823.

Read Full Post »

SEC lifts ban on open fundraising by startups, VCs, other funders

Senior Technology Reporter- Silicon Valley Business Journal

The Securities and Exchange Commission lifted a decades-long ban on open solicitation of funds by startups and fund managers on Wednesday.

The move was mandated by the JOBS Act more than a year ago, but was held up while the SEC studied how to implement the new rules.

The ban on general solicitation had forced founders and funders to solicit funds in private meetings and through word of mouth, although some new platforms such as AngelList have provided ways to be more transparent about fundraising.

The SEC said investment in funds and startups will still be limited to accredited investors whose liquid net worth is more than $1 million.

It also said that reasonable steps must be taken to assure that the investors meet that net worth standard.

Further, it will now require anybody doing a general solicitation to file a Form D with the SEC at least 15 days before starting their campaign. They must file a followup within 30 days of ending the solicitation.

It isn’t clear that established funds in Silicon Valley will start advertising since they prefer to raise money from large institutional investors.

Emergence Capital Partners founder Brian Jacobs told me, “Most VCs I know don’t want to raise money from individuals.”

Jacobs said that many VCs got started by raising money from their friends and from successful entrepreneurs but shifted to institutional backers later on.

“Those aren’t particularly reliable investors over the long haul,” Jacobs said. “Ultimately most venture funds want the stability of institutional backing.”

Alex Mittal, CEO of the FundersClub online venture capital platform, expects a wave of new offerings from funders and founders.

“In this new normal, issuers will be put under increased pressure to demonstrate the merits of the opportunities as well their own qualifications to investors, and investors will be wise to heavily scrutinize the reputation of issuers and the quality of offerings before proceeding with an investment,” he said in an email to me.

One immediate result of the SEC ruling was a satirical Twitter stream of possible hedge fund advertising slogans, such as, “Fee all that you can fee.”

Cromwell Schubarth is the Senior Technology Reporter at the Business Journal. His phone number is 408.299.1823.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »