Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for January, 2013

First Six Months Template

The format for the First Six Months Plan is organized as a matrix with time across the top and areas along the vertical axis.  Because there will be many things you do not know initially, the timeline provides greater clarity in greater detail in the short term and is  “fuzzier” as you approach the six-month milestone.  So, for example, typical timelines would be:  First Two Weeks, Second Two Weeks, Second Month, Months 3-4, Months 5-6.  The rows consist of the key areas that will need investigation.  While this will be dependent on the specific situation, typical categories would include “Strategy”, “Financials”, “Personnel”, “Customers”, “Sales”, “Services”, and “Operations”.

First Six Months Template

In most cases, a good First Six Months Plan will result in clear visibility to your board or management, and a reputation will be established for both accomplishment and transparency. The First Six Months Plan is a living document.  As time progresses, it should serve as a tracking mechanism for milestones met or not met, using simple visual clues. For example, highlight completed items in green, incomplete items in red or yellow, deleted items crossed out.  You can even make your Six Months Plan accessible online, with click-able details for each item.

As the first six months come to an end, a smooth transition to a Rolling Twelve-Month Plan as described in the section on Transforming the Business – A Three-Step Process for Business Transformation will ensure continued progress.

Copyright © 2012 Beatriz Infante  – All rights reserved.

Read Full Post »

Fabrice Grinda on Bloomberg TV Interview about his Angel Investing and one of his favorite companies:

Spotflux   http://spotflux.com

Please see Interview below – Spotflux around 5 minute 30 second mark towards end of interview

http://www.fabricegrinda.com/entrepreneurship/bloomberg-tv-interview-about-my-angel-investing-heuristics/

Read Full Post »

Purple Nation

January 8, 2013

Hagel Must Address ‘Jewish Lobby’ Comment

By Lanny J. Davis

http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/lanny-davis/275895-hagel-must-address-jewish-lobby-comment

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/08/hagel-owes-it-to-all-americans-to-address-jewish-lobby-comment/

http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/08/hagel-must-address-jewish-lobby-comment/

http://www.newsmax.com/LannyDavis/Hagel-Jewish-Lobby-Defense/2013/01/08/id/470522

I believe a president — Republican or Democrat — almost always deserves to have the Cabinet that he wishes, with the bar very, very high to oppose his choice. Thus, there should be heavy presumption that President Obama’s reported nominee for secretary of Defense, former Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel, should be confirmed by the Senate.

Whether senators agree or disagree with Hagel’s past positions — on the Iraq war (for the authorizing resolution, then turned against the war), declaring the Iranian Revolutionary Guard a “terrorist organization” (against), engaging with Iran in negotiations more aggressively (for), engaging with Hamas in seeking a peace agreement in the Middle East (for) — these positions are known to the president, and he still has decided to nominate Hagel for the post.

In any event, President Obama’s policies will be carried out by the new Secretary Hagel, not former Sen. Hagel.

But: Hagel owes it to all Americans, not just to American Jews, to do more than apologize for use of the expression “Jewish lobby” in communicating his concern about its power.

He must understand, first, that there is a difference between Jews who support Israel and the “Israel lobby.”

To suggest that there is a “Jewish lobby” is not only inaccurate, it is highly offensive to the American Jewish community.

First, as to the inaccuracy of the expression, here are a few indisputable facts:

Fact: There are many, many non-Jews who support Israel.

Fact: Most Americans, Jews and non-Jews (polls consistently show over 70 percent nationwide) support Israel because they see it as being in the U.S.’s national-security interests to do so — and because Israel is a democracy like ours, committed to the legal protection of civil rights, gay rights and human rights, including the rights of the more than 1 million Palestinian Israeli citizens.

Fact: Some of the strongest supporters of Israel are among evangelical and conservative Christians.

Fact: There are many Jewish Americans, including this writer, who are sometimes critical of the Israeli government’s policies and who strongly support a two-state solution, consistent with Israeli security interests.

As to why so many American Jews are highly offended by Hagel’s use of the expression “Jewish lobby,” if he doesn’t understand its historical association with virulent anti-Semitism and the scurrilous libel of “dual loyalty” used by anti-Semites against Jews, then I would ask him the following question:

Have you ever used the expression the “Catholic lobby” when describing pro-life lobbyists? If you did, would you understand why Catholics would be offended by that expression — because many Catholics are pro-choice and would be offended for you to invoke an expression describing their religion rather than their views on the abortion issue? Do you recall how offended John F. Kennedy was at the notion that he would have dual loyalty as president — to America and to the pope — a charge JFK vigorously denied and considered to be emblematic of anti-Catholic bigotry?

So if Hagel is confirmed as Defense secretary — and as of now, I believe he should be — I hope he does more than make an apology on the use of the “Jewish lobby” expression (as he already has regarding his anti-gays-in-the-military comments in past years). He needs to show that he understands, first, why he is factually wrong to describe a “Jewish lobby”; second, he needs to show greater sensitivity to the American Jewish community because he understands that expression evokes anti-Semitism through the ages.

On policy, he should explain why he opposed describing the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization even though it is a matter of record that they have financed terrorist operations against civilians in Israel; and why he favors Israel’s negotiating with Hamas, despite Hamas’s refusal to renounce terrorism and the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state.

I believe Hagel is a decent man, with an outstanding record of integrity as U.S. senator and military service as a patriot. He should address his use of the “Jewish lobby” expression directly and candidly — not only to reassure American Jews but also to clear up doubts that could hinder his effectiveness as secretary of Defense.

========================================================

Davis, the principal in the Washington law firm of Lanny J. Davis & Associates, which specializes in legal crisis management, served as President Clinton’s special counsel (1996-98) and as a member of President George W. Bush’s Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board (2006-07). He currently serves as special counsel to Dilworth Paxson and is a partner with former Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele in Purple Nation Solutions, a public affairs-strategic communications company. He is the author of the forthcoming book Crisis Tales – Five Rules for Handling Scandal in Business, Politics and Life, to be published by Simon & Schuster. He can be followed on Twitter @LannyDavis.

Read Full Post »

Article from GigaOm.

Between growing interest in fitness tracking devices, mobile health apps and software for adapting to the changing business of health care, digital health had a banner year in 2012.

According to a year-end funding report from health tech accelerator Rock Health, investors poured $1.4 billion into digital health companies last year, which is up 45 percent from their investment total of $968 million in 2011.  The report, released Monday by the San Francisco-based non-profit, also indicated a 56 percent increase in the number of deals closed in 2012.

As we’ve reported previously, these are interesting times in health care funding as investors rethink their support of biotech and traditional life sciences firms but back digital health companies that leverage mobile devices, cloud computing, open data, sensors and other emerging technology. Indeed, citing research from PricewaterhouseCoopers, Rock Health’s report said that investment in biotech and medical devices declined 4 percent and 16 percent respectively in 2012.

In total, the report said 134 digital health companies each raised more than $2 million in the last year, with one-third of all deals falling into four categories: healthcare purchasing tools for consumers, personal health tracking, Electronic Medical records and hospital administration.

While 179 firms and organizations invested in digital health companies, most only took part in a single deal, Rock Health said, with just eight investors making three or more investments in 2012. Qualcomm Ventures led the list of the most active investors, followed by Aberdare Ventures, Merck Global Health Innovation Fund and NEA.

The Bay Area and Boston lead the way in the number and value of  digital health deals, according to the report. But New York could be coming on strong given the launch of several health startup incubators including Blueprint HealthStartup Health and the New York Digital Health Accelerator in the Big Apple last year.

Read more here.

Read Full Post »

San Francisco, January, 2013
Successful “Date Certain M&A” of Materials Science company, its Assets and Intellectual Property
Steven R. Gerbsman, Principal of Gerbsman Partners (http://gerbsmanpartners.com)and James McHugh, a member of Gerbsman Partners Board of Intellectual Capital, announced today their success in maximizing stakeholder value for a materials science company. The company designed, developed and manufactured high performance turnkey equipment for Atomic Layer Deposition (“ALD”).

Gerbsman Partners provided Crisis Management and Investment Banking leadership, facilitated the sale of the business unit’s assets and its associated Intellectual Property. Due to market conditions, Board of Directors and the Senior Lender made the strategic decision to maximize the value of the business unit and Intellectual Property.

Gerbsman Partners provided leadership to the company with:

1.  Crisis Management and technology domain expertise in developing the strategic action plans for maximizing value of the business unit, Intellectual Property and assets;
2.  Proven domain expertise in maximizing the value of the business unit and Intellectual Property through a Gerbsman Partners targeted and proprietary “Date Certain M&A Process”;
3.  The ability to “Manage the Process” among potential Acquirers, Lawyers, Creditors Management and Advisors;
4.  The proven ability to “Drive” toward successful closure for all parties at interest.
About Gerbsman Partners

Gerbsman Partners focuses on maximizing enterprise value for stakeholders and shareholders in under-performing, under-capitalized and under-valued companies and their Intellectual Property. Since 2001, Gerbsman Partners has been involved in maximizing value for 75 Technology, Life Science and Medical Device companies and their Intellectual Property and has restructured/terminated over $810 million of real estate executory contracts and equipment lease/sub-debt obligations. Since inception in 1980, Gerbsman Partners has been involved in over $2.3 billion of financings, restructurings and M&A transactions.

Gerbsman Partners has offices and strategic alliances in Boston, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, Orange County, Europe and Israel. For additional information please visit http://www.gerbsmanpartners.com or Gerbsman Partners blog.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts