Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Venture Capital Dispatch’ Category

  • NYC Needs More Iconic Companies, Fewer Early Exits, VC Says

    By Yuliya Chernova

    Mark Lennihan/Associated Press

    New York.

    Bill Gurley, partner at Benchmark Capital, leveled a number of serious charges at a ballroom full of New Yorkers this week–the city has yet to produce an iconic venture-backed company, he said. And, he added, people here are more likely to sell early rather than create a true home-run for a venture firm via an IPO.

    Out of the 50 venture-backed companies that raised the most money via sales or IPOs over the years, none were located in New York City and only five were based in the New York region–that is in New Jersey or Connecticut, according to data from Dow Jones VentureSource.

    “What New York needs is more iconic companies that last over a long time,” said Gurley, on stage at Disrupt NY 2013, a conference organized by TechCrunch. Gurley, who said that Benchmark has made two investments in New York recently, compared the city to Seattle, where the top four businesses, MicrosoftAmazonCostco and Starbucks, were all backed by venture capital.

Read Full Post »

With money in their pockets and change on their minds, some 700 angel investors flocked to the Angel Capital Association Summit in San Francisco this week.

Alexander Klein/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Along with macro issues like best practices for syndicating rounds and navigating the Series A crunch, attendees buzzed about the JOBS Act, new funding platforms and other recent changes to the $20 billion a year marketplace of private investing. One of the most popular panels however, focused on a topic that’s always been near and dear to investors: exits.

“We don’t know if we’re investors until the exit occurs–until then we’re merely donors,” said Ohio TechAngel Funds Founder John Huston, eliciting laughter and some wistful sighs in the packed conference room. The panel–“8 Steps to Lucrative Exits”–was one of five devoted to the topic, with Huston suggesting all angel investors set up a process for achieving an exit before they ever enter a deal.

Huston focused entirely on exits through acquisition–a topic worthy of tutelage given the sluggishness of late. According to a recent report by Dow Jones VentureSource, M&A activity declined 44% during the first quarter of 2013 compared with the previous quarter, with the most recent quarter being the lowest since the first quarter of 2009. Huston advised investors to set exit expectations with founders from the onset and build the company for acquisition–not shareholder value.

“If you are on the board then it’s incumbent upon you to drive the exit. All the other angels are counting on you,” he said, adding that if VCs are on the cap table “then you’re neutered unless you drove the VC selection process.”

He said simply growing revenue, although nice, was too slow a process to incite high bids.

To maximize buyer value he suggested compiling a hit list of the top five strategic acquirers based on their willingness and ability to do a deal. Determining which customers they’d like to secure [and then beating them to it] and mapping their organization chart to sell the deal should also be part of the process, he said.

“Your goal is to move the strategic acquirers from greed to fear mode which is ‘Wow, I sure hope my biggest competitors doesn’t acquire them first.’ We only hire bankers [to run the sale process] if we are convinced they can do this and run the process with multiple bids,” Huston said.

Greg Sitters, managing director of New Zealand-based Sparkbox Venture Group, said he began using a similar process about four years ago and has had four of his 40 companies exit so far. Striking a balance between growing each company with additional capital and securing a solid exit has been key.

He said: “If we can get companies to exit without VCs than that’s what we’re trying to do.”

Teresa Esser, managing director of Winsconsin-based angel group Silicon Pastures, said her group is constantly trying to bring more of a science to the exit process.

“This entire conference is really helpful with information and inspiration,” she said. “It’s motivational in reminding us that we are a $20 billion marketplace.”

Write to Lizette Chapman at lizette.chapman@dowjones.com. Follow her on Twitter at @zettewil

Read Full Post »

Venture Capital Dispatch

An inside look from VentureWire at high-tech start-ups and their investors.

 

The Daily Startup: VCs Buy In to Mobile Game Maker Supercell

 

Top stories in today’s VentureWire:

 

dailystartup_D_20090806101628.jpgArt by Mike Lucas

 

Eager to own a slice of the wildly profitable Finnish mobile game maker Supercell, venture investors have purchased existing shares totaling $130 million at a $770 million valuation. Index Ventures led the deal with participation from Institutional Venture Partners and Atomico. Founded in 2011, SuperCell is currently the highest-grossing iOS game developer with “Clash of Clans” and “Hay Day” now bringing in $2.5 million of revenue daily.

 

Enlighted raised $20 million in Series C funding led by Rockport Capital for its lighting-controls technology, as it operates in a quickly changing market where the price for lighting emitting diodes is declining. The company makes sensors and software that is installed in commercial spaces and that helps decide when to dim lights. A newer application of the technology would also allow the sensors to measure temperature and occupancy, and control not just lighting but also air conditioning.

 

Also in today’s VentureWire, Reduxio Systems has raised a $9 million Series A round led by Jerusalem Venture Partners and Carmel Ventures. Reduxio is developing storage systems that make use of both flash memory and hard drives…Smart-home startup Zonoff has secured a $3.8 million Series A round for software that makes all kinds of smart-home devices work smoothly together and makes them easier to set up and control…and Crowdtilt has raised $12 million in Series A funding led by Andreessen Horowitz to bring a new twist to crowdfunding. Crowdtilt’s apps give groups an easy way to fund their own initiatives, rather than asking for money from strangers online.

 

(VentureWire is a daily newsletter with comprehensive analysis of all the investments, deals and personnel moves involving startups and their venture backers. For a two-week trial, visit our homepage, scroll to the bottom and click “try for free.”)

 

Elsewhere around the Web:

 

Launching mobile game apps is getting expensive. Case in point: ZeptoLab says it will spend about $1 million to launch “Cut the Rope: Time Travel” but it spent almost nothing to promote the first “Cut the Rope” game’s release in 2010, The Wall Street Journal reports. What has changed is the mobile games business, which is now so competitive that word-of-mouth marketing is no longer enough.

 

 Jon Flint, a founder of venture firm Polaris Partners, got into the hair-care business after his stylist suggested that he take a meeting with a colleague in New York who wanted to start a company. Flint and his partners turned to MIT”s Robert Langer to come up with innovative products. Flint talks with WSJ about the company that resulted, Living Proof, which is co-owned by actress Jennifer Aniston.

 

Silicon Valley startups are increasingly hiring testing companies to vet apps before releasing them to the public, WSJ reports.

Read Full Post »

Venture Capital Dispatch

Crowdfunding 101: ‘Reg-D’ vs. ‘Rewards’

By Lora Kolodny
Pebble Technology Corp. founder Eric Migicovsky wears the Pebble, a smartphone-enabled watch. Last year his company raised $10.3 million from donors on crowdfunding site Kickstarter.

Small U.S. investors can donate money to a startup on a crowdfunding site such as Kickstarter, but they won’t get a stake in the company in exchange.

Despite changes in federal law, Americans can’t yet legally put money into a startup in an “equity crowdfunding,” an investment method that is open to ”accredited investors” only.

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, enacted and signed into law in April last year, was meant to enable this. It eased accounting and disclosure requirements on smaller companies to help them go public, aiming to spur growth and create jobs.

The idea was that eventually, investors of every kind would be able to find startups or small businesses that they want to back online, hammer out deal terms and complete the transaction, all digitally.

Under the new leadership of Chairman Elisse B. Walter, the Securities and Exchange Commission is overdue in delivering the rules that will make it possible for startups to attain crowdfunding for equity from “ordinary Americans” (to borrow a phrase from President Obama).

Here’s a quick guide to the two main types of crowdfunding out there right now:

‘Reg-D’ Crowdfunding

For now, only broker-dealers licensed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and those regulated by the SEC and FINRA can legally conduct these transactions between startups and investors online in the U.S. Likewise, only accredited investors–as defined by the SEC–can use those sites to invest.

This subset of equity crowdfunding is referred to as “Reg-D” crowdfunding, a nod to the SEC’s existing Regulation D and the forms that a privately held company must fill out and file when it sells its securities.

Some sites offering Reg-D crowdfunding in the U.S. today are: AngelList in partnership with SecondMarket; Microventures; FundersClub in partnership with a large national bank that the company declined to name; CircleUp in partnership with W.R. Hambrecht; and Fundroom with securities offered through Wealthforge.

With Reg-D crowdfunding, accredited investors pool their money to provide a seed- or venture-capital round to a promising startup. In exchange, the investors get some stake in that company’s business of course.

The deals done through Reg-D crowdfunding sites may be convertible debt or equity deals, as with early-stage funds from venture firms and angel groups.

‘Rewards-Based’ Crowdfunding

Equity and Reg-D crowdfunding are different than the already mainstream variety of crowdfunding seen on sites like Kickstarter and Indiegogo.

Those more popular (and less regulated) sites offer “rewards-based” crowdfunding. They let almost anyone–not just accredited investors–contribute a few bucks (instead of thousands) to a project or person they like on the site.

Almost anyone can post a project for funders’ consideration, too.

In return for their money, project backers there get a reward, like a logo T-shirt, or a ticket to an event where they can meet the project’s creators.

Write to Lora Kolodny at lora.kolodny@dowjones.com. Follow her on Twitter at @lorakolodny

Read Full Post »

Venture Capital Dispatch
An inside look from VentureWire at high-tech start-ups and their investors.

Jan 18, 2013

Alchemist Accelerator Graduates its First Class
By Deborah Gage

Helping businesses figure out how to make money has been less appealing for entrepreneurs than writing Web apps for the public, but that’s changing with Alchemist Accelerator, which was inspired by a Harvard Club of San Francisco project and is trying to instill business skills into technical entrepreneurs.

On Thursday on the Microsoft campus, backed by music from “Star Wars” and “Mission Impossible,” nine startup teams graduated from the Alchemist Accelerator, which offers a $28,000 investment, six months of training and introductions to potential customers and mentors from Stanford University faculty and Silicon Valley executives and entrepreneurs.

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »