Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Date Certain M&A Process’

gp_nl_header-1
SALE OF IGENICA, INC.
Gerbsman Partners has been retained by Igenica, Inc. to solicit interest for the acquisition of all, or substantially all, the assets of Igenica, Inc.

Igenica Biotherapeutics (Igenica) is a privately held biotechnology company located in Burlingame, California, founded in 2009. Igenica is harnessing the natural tumor microenvironment to deliver a pipeline of high-impact antibody-based cancer therapeutics.

The acquisition of Igenica enables immediate access to proprietary technology and preclinical drug candidates. To date, Igenica has raised six rounds of private financing totaling $83 million in venture capital funded by a premier team of life science investors including The Column Group, OrbiMed, 5AM Ventures and Third Rock Ventures.

Igenica Biotherapeutics has a patent portfolio that consists of twelve (12) families which include twenty-four (24) patent and provisional applications and seven (7) international PCT applications with the intent to protect the company’s antibody platform (so as to make sure this platform is different from the ADC Technology), ADC technology, preclinical and clinical assets.

Igenica has developed:
· A novel technology (sTAg) for Identifying overexpressed proteins on tumor cell surfaces
· A novel method (iTAb) to generate tumor antigen specific monoclonal antibodies
· A novel antibody dependent conjugation platform (SNAP) including a proprietary linker
· Several well characterized drug candidates that show promise in preclinical studies
· One clinical drug candidate, IGN523, which halted development post a phase I dose escalation trial due to lack of efficacy in AML. The company believes that IGN523 may show promise as a combination therapy or for an indication other than AML
· A large, pending patent estate which has ongoing prosecution, but no issued patents as of this date

Igenica has no recurring revenues, product or collaboration related. Its value lies in the preclinical and clinical assets produced by its underlying and proprietary technology.

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE:

The information in this memorandum does not constitute the whole or any part of an offer or a contract.

The information contained in this memorandum relating to Igenica’s Assets has been supplied by Igenica. It has not been independently investigated or verified by Gerbsman Partners or its agents.

Potential purchasers should not rely on any information contained in this memorandum or provided by Igenica, or Gerbsman Partners (or their respective staff, agents, and attorneys) in connection herewith, whether transmitted orally or in writing as a statement, opinion, or representation of fact. Interested parties should satisfy themselves through independent investigations as they or their legal and financial advisors see fit.
Igenica, Gerbsman Partners, and their respective staff, agents, and attorneys, (i) disclaim any and all implied warranties concerning the truth, accuracy, and completeness of any information provided in connection herewith and (ii) do not accept liability for the information, including that contained in this memorandum, whether that liability arises by reasons of Igenica’s or Gerbsman Partners’ negligence or otherwise.

Any sale of the Igenica Assets will be made on an “as-is,” “where-is,” and “with all faults” basis, without any warranties, representations, or guarantees, either express or implied, of any kind, nature, or type whatsoever from, or on behalf of Igenica or Gerbsman Partners. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Igenica and Gerbsman Partners and their respective staff, agents, and attorneys, hereby expressly disclaim any and all implied warranties concerning the condition of the Igenica Assets and any portions thereof, including, but not limited to, environmental conditions, compliance with any government regulations or requirements, the implied warranties of habitability, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose.

This memorandum contains confidential information and is not to be supplied to any person without Gerbsman Partners’ prior consent. This memorandum and the information contained herein are subject to the non-disclosure agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Historical Company Information

Igenica’s foundational vision was to build a biopharmaceutical company with a complete suite of technologies supporting the discovery of antibody-based therapeutics. Our rigorous approach to target discovery and antibody development considers patient profile, tissue expression, the tumor micro-environment and antibody function as primary factors.

Our target discovery platform, sTAg (surface Tagged Antigen), systematically profiles proteins found on the cell surface of primary tumors to identify antibody-accessible antigens as candidate targets. Tumor-specific surface proteins are identified and quantified by applying advanced mass spectrometry analysis.

To identify functional antibodies that are specific to target candidates, we developed a platform, iTAb (in vivo anti-Tumor Antibody), that generates diverse antibodies and screens Ab candidates in vivo, to select antibodies with the most potent anti-tumor activity. This platform has been applied to develop naked functional antibodies, including next-generation immune-oncology therapies for cancer.

Our proprietary site-specific ADC platform technology, SNAP, addresses the major limitations of current and competitive approaches by providing a simple, elegant, chemically-driven method for linking a functional Ab and small molecule cytotoxin. Our SNAP technology results in a highly flexible bi-functional linker that, by design, yields homogeneous ADCs armed with the optimal toxin payload. SNAP is also a highly flexible system that is amenable to any antibody, linker or toxin, and can tune the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) to specifically 2, 3, or 4, making it an ideal technology for internally and externally generated programs.

Igenica Company Profile

Igenica is focused on the discovery and development of immune-modulating antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for the treatment of cancer. We are the only biotherapeutic company that fully powers the ADC development spectrum from a clinically relevant approach to target and functional antibody discovery to ADC creation, accelerating development and the delivery of effective therapies to patients.

Founded in 2009, Igenica is led by a proven team of leaders that have demonstrated success in antibody drug discovery, clinical development and commercialization. Based in Burlingame, Calif., we were well-funded by a premier team of life science investors including The Column Group, OrbiMed, 5AM Ventures and Third Rock Ventures.

Patent description

Igenica Biotherapeutics has a patent portfolio that consists of twelve (12) families which include twenty-four (24) patent and provisional applications and seven (7) international PCT applications with the intent to protect the companies’ platform, ADC technology, preclinical and clinical assets.

Impact of Technology on the Market and Why Igenica Assets are Attractive

We are focused on the development of innovative immunotherapies, functional antibodies directed to the tumor, and antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of cancer. All of Igenica’s product candidates were discovered using our proprietary product engine.

· iTab platform generates high-affinity antibodies with broad epitope coverage and in vivo anti-tumor efficacy in preclinical models
· SNAP platform can provide homogeneous drug-to-antibody ratios (DARs) of 2, 3, or 4, is adaptable to all payload classes and reduces manufacturing risks of ADCs
· Igenica’s antibodies are of high affinity and cover various elements of immunotherapy
· Combination therapy with Igenica antibodies have the potential to significantly impact anticancer immunotherapy
· Igenica antibodies have been tested in preclinical efficacy models and/or cynomolgus monkeys for safety

Igenica’s Assets

· Intellectual Property
· Numerous preclinical studies demonstrating anti-tumor efficacy in various tumor models, safety and PK/PD assessments in non-human primates
· Procedures and methods for target identification, antibody generation and antibody drug conjugation chemistry

IGN523
Igenica developed IGN523 (anti-CD98) for the treatment of multiple hematologic and solid tumors. Expression of CD98 has been shown to be upregulated in a variety of hematologic malignancies, including AML, and in several types of solid tumors, particularly squamous cell carcinomas. Its elevated expression is correlated with poor prognosis and patient outcome. Previous studies have demonstrated that CD98 functions both in integrin signaling and amino acid transport processes, which support the proliferation, anchorage-independence, invasion, and metastasis of tumor cells (Cancer Cell 2016; 30(5): 792-805; Int. J. Cancer 2015; 137(3): 710-720).
· IGN523 is a high affinity antibody that works through multiple mechanisms of action potentially reducing the risk of developing treatment resistance
· IGN523 has been in a Phase 1 clinical trial in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The trial has been designed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of IGN523
· Preclinical studies indicate that in addition to AML non-small lung cancer patients express high levels of CD98 and could benefit from IGN523 treatment
· Immunohistochemical staining reagents are available to be developed as a patient stratification tool
· IGN523 can be readily produced as master cell bank with contract manufacturer is available

IGN381
IGN381 forms the basis for an innovative approach to immunotherapy by targeting an immune checkpoint target called VISTA or c10orf54 that plays a complimentary role in the tumor micro-environment to other known immune checkpoints. Igenica developed an active antibody program and has humanized a lead candidate. We believe this program is well positioned to complement existing immunotherapy approaches.

· IGN381 is a high affinity mAb with data supporting immune checkpoint inhibition differentiation relative to lead competitor mAb
· Safety of IGN381 has been assessed alone and together with anti-PD1 antibody (pembrolizumab) in a PK/PD 6 weeks repeat-dose study in non-human primates
· Strong evidence of VISTA immune regulatory function in a non-redundant, MDSC-mediated immune regulatory axis
· Extensive expression profiling reveals that VISTA expression pattern is consistent with extensive role on MDSCs and unique among immune checkpoint regulators
· Increased expression in immune infiltrates within tumors may result in decreased overall survival of NSCLC patients
· Igenica has identified a putative heterophilic binding partner for VISTA
· Patent applications on these antibodies and other novel aspects of this program have been filed

IGN786
Discovered using Igenica’s sTAg protoemics technology, SAIL (c16orf54) has not been studied or described in humans previously. Given the expression profile of this target, IGN786 has the potential to be an exquisitely specific targeted therapy for multiple cancer indications with high unmet medical need, including follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), multiple myeloma, and pancreatic cancer. Igenica developed IGN786 as an antibody-drug conjugate using Igenica’s proprietary ADC technology. Igenica has filed patent applications with claims protecting multiple unique aspects of this novel therapeutic agent (Blood Cancer J 2015; 5: e316).

· SAIL is a highly novel ADC target derived from a proteomics-based target discovery approach
· IGN786 leverages Igenica’s SNAP ADC technology to optimally target SAIL-expressing tumors
· Based on the expression profile of SAIL, IGN786 is being developed to address high unmet medical need in multiple hematologic and solid tumor indications
· IGN786 induces tumor regression in multiple AML xenograft models
· IGN786 displays a favorable toxicology profile in non-human primates (NOAEL of 20 mg/kg)

CD39
· Strong evidence CD39 immune regulatory function through purinergic signaling within the CD39/CD73/adenosine pathway
· CD39 expression profile reveals higher levels of expression in tumors, Tregs and myeloid cells within the TME relative to normal tissues
· 9-8B mAb is a high affinity anti-CD39 mAb with data supporting functional blocking of CD39 ATPase activity (Am J Trans Res 2015; 7(6): 1181-1188)
· 9-8B inhibits tumor growth through cell killing in vivo
· 9-8B mAb has been humanized in silico
· Patent applications have been filed on Igenica’s antibodies and methods of treatment

The assets of Igenica will be sold in whole or in part (collectively, the “Igenica Assets”). The sale of these assets is being conducted with the cooperation of Igenica. Igenica and its consultants will be available to assist purchasers with due diligence and a prompt, efficient transition to new ownership.
Igenica, Inc. Key Personnel
· Edward van der Horst — Senior Director Preclinical Drug Development: Edward van der Horst, Ph.D., joined Igenica in 2010 as director of preclinical development, bringing in-depth knowledge of oncology and 15 years of experience in the development of monoclonal antibody therapeutics, target discovery, selection and validation. His contributions and discoveries have led to the development and clinical evaluation of anti-DLL4 and anti-NOTCH2/3 antibodies at OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the first clinical stage anti-HER3 antibody at U3 Pharma GmbH (acquired by Daiichi-Sankyo), and Igenica’s first IND filing. Dr. van der Horst studied chemistry at the Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf and the Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich. For his master’s thesis he conducted research at the Max-Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Munich and holds a Ph.D. in biochemistry from the Max-Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Munich. Dr. van der Horst completed his postdoctoral studies at Tularik, Inc., acquired by Amgen, Inc. in 2004.

· Hans van Houte — CFO: Hans van Houte joined Igenica in 2011 and brings broad financial and operational experience with biotechnology companies. Prior to Igenica, Mr. van Houte served in senior financial roles, including vice president, finance and administration for Trubion Pharmaceuticals, where he led the company’s private financing efforts and managing its IPO preparation. Prior to Trubion, Mr. van Houte was the controller, assistant treasurer and principal accounting officer for Vertex Pharmaceuticals, where he helped build the organization post-IPO to support growth from a $100 million company to a multibillion market cap. Mr. van Houte holds a B.S. in finance and management from Babson College.

Igenica, Inc. Board of Directors
David Goeddel, PhD: Chairman of the Board, Managing Partner, The Column Group.
Mark Goldsmith, MD, PhD: Partner, Third Rock Ventures.
John Diekman, PhD: Founding Partner 5AM Ventures.
Robert Schreiber, PhD: Igenica Co-founder, Alumni endowed Professor of pathology and immunology, Professor of molecular microbiology, co-leader of the tumor immunology program for the Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine and founding Director of the Washington University center for human immunology and immunotherapy programs. Schreiber played a key role in developing the iTAb platform and is an acknowledged leader in the field of cancer immunology and immunotherapy.
The Bidding Process for Interested Buyers

Interested and qualified parties will be expected to sign a nondisclosure agreement (attached hereto as Exhibit A) to have access to key members of the management and intellectual capital teams and the due diligence “war room” documentation (the “Due Diligence Access”). Each interested party, as a consequence of the Due Diligence Access granted to it, shall be deemed to acknowledge and represent (i) that it is bound by the bidding procedures described herein; (ii) that it has an opportunity to inspect and examine the Igenica Assets and to review all pertinent documents and information with respect thereto; (iii) that it is not relying upon any written or oral statements, representations, or warranties of Igenica, Inc., Gerbsman Partners, or their respective staff, agents, or attorneys; and (iv) all such documents and reports have been provided solely for the convenience of the interested party, and neither Igenica nor Gerbsman Partners (or their respective, staff, agents, or attorneys) makes any representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the same.

Following an initial round of due diligence, interested parties will be invited to participate with a sealed bid, for the acquisition of the Igenica Assets. Sealed bids must be submitted so that the bid is actually received by Gerbsman Partners no later than Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time (the “Bid Deadline”) at Igenica’s office, located at 863A Mitten Road Ste. 100B2, Burlingame, California 94010. Please also email steve@gerbsmanpartners.com with any bid.

Bids should identify those assets being tendered for in a specific and identifiable way. The attached Igenica fixed asset list may not be complete and Bidders interested in the Igenica’s Assets must submit a separate bid for such assets. Be specific as to the assets desired.

Any person or other entity making a bid must be prepared to provide independent confirmation that they possess the financial resources to complete the purchase where applicable. All bids must be accompanied by a refundable deposit check in the amount of $200,000 (payable to Igenica, Inc.). The winning bidder will be notified within 3 business days after the Bid Deadline. Non-successful bidders will have their deposit returned to them.

Igenica reserves the right to, in its sole discretion, accept or reject any bid, or withdraw any or all assets from sale. Interested parties should understand that it is expected that the highest bid will be chosen as the winning bidder and bidders may not have the opportunity to improve their bids after submission.

Igenica will require the successful bidder to close within 7 business days. Any or all of the assets of Igenica will be sold on an “as is, where is” basis, with no representation or warranties whatsoever.

All sales, transfer, and recording taxes, stamp taxes, or similar taxes, if any, relating to the sale of the Igenica Assets shall be the sole responsibility of the successful bidder and shall be paid to Igenica at the closing of each transaction.

For additional information, please see below and/or contact:

Steven R. Gerbsman
(415) 456-0628
steve@gerbsmanpartners.com

Kenneth Hardesty
(408) 591-7528
ken@gerbsmanpartners.com

Read Full Post »

The Bidding Process, Procedures for the Sale of certain Assets and Intellectual Property of InterValve, Inc.

Further to Gerbsman Partners Update on October 16, 2016 regarding the sale of certain assets of InterValve, Inc. (“InterValve”), I am attaching the Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”) that is required with any bid and refundable wire transfer information for interested parties bidding on the assets and IP of InterValve.

Ken, Dennis and I will be following up to review the Bidding Process, schedule due diligence meetings and answer any questions regarding the “Date Certain M&A Process”.

Gerbsman Partners has been retained by InterValve, Inc. to solicit interest for the acquisition of all or substantially all of InterValves’s assets, including its Intellectual Property (“IP”), in whole or in part (collectively, the “InterValve Assets”).

Any and all the assets of InterValve will be sold on an “as is, where is” basis and will be subject to “The Bidding Process for Interested Buyers”, outlined below.

Prior to the bid date of November 16, 2016, I would encourage all interested parties to have their counsel speak with William Kaufman, Esq. of Fox Rothschild LLP – wkaufman@foxrothchilds.com at 612 617–7485 regarding reviewing and negotiating the attached “APA”. He is available to discuss any questions or comments of a legal nature relating to the transactions contemplated by the “APA”.

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE

The information in this memorandum does not constitute the whole or any part of an offer or a contract.

The information contained in this memorandum relating to InterValve’s Assets has been supplied by InterValve. It has not been independently investigated or verified by Gerbsman Partners or their respective agents.

Potential purchasers should not rely on any information contained in this memorandum or provided by Gerbsman Partners (or their respective staff, agents, and attorneys) in connection herewith, whether transmitted orally or in writing as a statement, opinion, or representation of fact. Interested parties should satisfy themselves through independent investigations as they or their legal and financial advisors see fit.

Gerbsman Partners, and their respective staff, agents, and attorneys, (i) disclaim any and all implied warranties concerning the truth, accuracy, and completeness of any information provided in connection herewith and (ii) do not accept liability for the information, including that contained in this memorandum, whether that liability arises by reasons of InterValve’s or Gerbsman Partners’ negligence or otherwise.

Any sale of the InterValve Assets will be made on an “as-is,” “where-is,” and “with all faults” basis, without any warranties, representations, or guarantees, either express or implied, of any kind, nature, or type whatsoever from, or on behalf of InterValve and Gerbsman Partners. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, InterValve and Gerbsman Partners and their respective staff, agents, and attorneys, hereby expressly disclaim any and all implied warranties concerning the condition of the InterValve Assets and any portions thereof, including, but not limited to, environmental conditions, compliance with any government regulations or requirements, the implied warranties of habitability, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose.

This memorandum contains confidential information and is not to be supplied to any person without Gerbsman Partners’ prior consent. This memorandum and the information contained herein are subject to the non-disclosure agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.

The Bidding Process for Interested Buyers

Interested and qualified parties will be expected to sign a nondisclosure agreement (attached hereto as Exhibit A) to have access to key members of the management and intellectual capital teams and the due diligence “war room” documentation (the “Due Diligence Access”). Each interested party, as a consequence of the Due Diligence Access granted to it, shall be deemed to acknowledge and represent (i) that it is bound by the bidding procedures described herein; (ii) that it has an opportunity to inspect and examine the InterValve Assets and to review all pertinent documents and information with respect thereto; (iii) that it is not relying upon any written or oral statements, representations, or warranties of InterValve, Inc., Gerbsman Partners, or their respective staff, agents, or attorneys; and (iv) all such documents and reports have been provided solely for the convenience of the interested party, and neither InterValve nor Gerbsman Partners (or their respective, staff, agents, or attorneys) makes any representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the same.

Following an initial round of due diligence, interested parties will be invited to participate with a sealed bid, for the acquisition of the InterValve Assets. Sealed bids must be submitted so that the bid is actually received by Gerbsman Partners no later than November 16, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. Central Standard Time (the “Bid Deadline”) at InterValve’s office, located at 2445 Xenium Lane North, Plymouth, Minnesota 55441. Please also email steve@gerbsmanpartners.com with any bid.

Bids should identify those assets being tendered for in a specific and identifiable way. The attached InterValve fixed asset list may not be complete and Bidders interested in the InterValve’s Assets must submit a separate bid for such assets. Be specific as to the assets desired.

Any person or other entity making a bid must be prepared to provide independent confirmation that they possess the financial resources to complete the purchase where applicable. All bids must be accompanied by a refundable deposit check in the amount of $200,000 (payable to InterValve, Inc.). The winning bidder will be notified within 3 business days after the Bid Deadline. Non-successful bidders will have their deposit returned to them.

InterValve reserves the right to, in its sole discretion, accept or reject any bid, or withdraw any or all assets from sale. Interested parties should understand that it is expected that the highest bid will be chosen as the winning bidder and bidders may not have the opportunity to improve their bids after submission.

InterValve will require the successful bidder to close within 7 business days. Any or all of the assets of InterValve will be sold on an “as is, where is” basis, with no representation or warranties whatsoever.

All sales, transfer, and recording taxes, stamp taxes, or similar taxes, if any, relating to the sale of the InterValve Assets shall be the sole responsibility of the successful bidder and shall be paid to InterValve at the closing of each transaction.

For additional information, please see below and/or contact:

Steven R. Gerbsman
(415) 456-0628
steve@gerbsmanpartners.com

Kenneth Hardesty
(408) 591-7528
ken@gerbsmanpartners.com

Read Full Post »

gp_nl_header-1

San Francisco, September, 2016
The Advantages of a “Date-Certain” Mergers and Acquisition Process Over a “Standard Mergers and Acquisitions Process”
Every venture capital investor hopes that all of his investments will succeed. The reality is that a large percentage of all venture investments must be shut down. In extreme cases, such a shut down will take the form of a formal bankruptcy or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. In most cases, however, the investment falls into the category of “living dead”, i.e. companies that are not complete failures but that are not self-sustaining and whose prospects do not justify continued investment. Almost never do investors shut down such a “living dead” company quickly.

Most hope against hope that things will change. Once reality sets in, most investors hire an investment banker to sell such a company through a standard mergers and acquisition process – seldom with good results. Often, such a process requires some four to six months, burns up all the remaining cash in the company and leads to a formal bankruptcy or assignment for the benefit of creditors. In many instances, there are a complete lack of bidders, despite the existence of real value in the company being sold.

The first reason for this sad result is a fundamental misunderstanding of buyer psychology. In general, buyers act quickly and pay the highest price only when forced to by competitive pressure. The highest probability buyers are those who are already familiar with the company being sold, i.e. competitors, existing investors, customers and vendors. Such buyers either already know of the company’s weakness or quickly understand it as soon as they see the seller’s financials. Once the sales process starts, the seller is very much a wasting asset both financially and organizationally. Potential buyers quickly divide the company’s burn rate into its existing cash balance to see how much time it has left. Employees, customers and vendors grow nervous and begin to disengage. Unless compelled to act, potential buyers simply draw out the process and either submit a low-ball offer when the company is out of cash or try to pick up key employees and customers at no cost when the company shuts down.

The second reason for this sad result is a misunderstanding of the psychology and methods of investment bankers. Most investment bankers do best at selling “hot” companies, i.e. where the company’s value is perceived by buyers to be increasing quickly over time and where there are multiple bidders. They tend to be most motivated and work hardest in such situations because the transaction sizes (i.e. commissions) tend to be large, because the publicity brings in more assignments and because such situations are more simply more fun. They also tend to be most effective in maximizing value in such situations, as they are good at using time to their advantage, pitting multiple buyers against each other and setting very high expectations. In a situation where “time is not your friend”, the actions of a standard investment banker frequently make a bad situation far worse. First, since transaction sizes tend to be much smaller, an investment banker will assign his “B” team to the deal and will only have such team spend enough time on the deal to see if it can be closed easily. Second, playing out the process works against the seller. Third, trying to pit multiple buyers against each other and setting unrealistically high valuation expectations tends to drive away potential buyers, who often know far more about the real situation of the seller than does the investment banker.

“Date Certain M&A Process”-  The solution in a situation where “time is not your friend” is a “Date Certain Mergers and Acquisitions Process”. With a “Date Certain M&A Process”, the company’s board of directors hires a crisis management/ private investment banking firm (“advisor”) to wind down business operations in an orderly fashion and maximize value of the IP and tangible assets. The advisor works with the board and corporate management to:

  1.  Focus on the control, preservation and forecasting of CASH.
  2. Develop a strategy/action plan and presentation to maximize value of the assets. Including drafting sales materials, preparing information Ïdue diligence war-roomÓ, assembling a list of all possible interested buyers for the IP and assets of the company and identifying and retaining key employees on a go-forward basis.
  3. Stabilize and provide leadership, motivation and morale to all employees,
  4. Communicate with the Board of Directors, senior management, senior lender, creditors, vendors and all stakeholders in interest.
  5. The company’s attorney prepares very simple “as is, where is” asset-sale documents. (“as is, where is- no reps or warranties” agreements is very important as the board of directors, officers and investors typically do not want any additional exposure on the deal). The advisor then contacts and follows-up systematically with all potentially interested parties (to include customers, competitors, strategic partners, vendors and a proprietary distribution list of equity investors) and coordinates their interactions with company personnel, including arranging on-site visits.
  6. Typical terms for a date certain M&A asset sale include no representations and warranties, a sales date typically two to four weeks from the point that sale materials are ready for distribution (based on available CASH), a significant cash deposit in the $200,000 range to bid and a strong preference for cash consideration and the ability to close the deal in 7 business days.

Date Certain M&A terms can be varied to suit needs unique to a given situation or corporation. For example, the board of directors may choose not to accept any bid or to allow parties to re-bid if there are multiple competitive bids and/or to accept an early bid. The typical workflow timeline, from hiring an advisor to transaction close and receipt of consideration is five to six weeks, although such timing may be extended if circumstances warrant. Once the consideration is received, the restructuring/insolvency attorney then distributes the consideration to creditors and shareholders (if there is sufficient consideration to satisfy creditors) and takes all necessary steps to wind down the remaining corporate shell, typically with the CFO, including issuing W-2 and 1099 forms, filing final tax returns, shutting down a 401K program and dissolving the corporation etc.

The advantages of this approach include the following:

Speed – The entire process for a “Date certain M&A Process” can be concluded in 5 to 6 weeks. Creditors and investors receive their money quickly. The negative public relations impact on investors and board members of a drawn-out process is eliminated. If circumstances require, this timeline can be reduced to as little as two weeks, although a highly abbreviated response time will often impact the final value received during the asset auction.

Reduced Cash Requirements – Given the “Date Certain M&A Process” compressed turnaround time, there is a significantly reduced requirement for investors to provide cash to support the company during such a process.

Value Maximized – A company in wind-down mode is a rapidly depreciating asset, with management, technical team, customer and creditor relations increasingly strained by fear, uncertainty and doubt. A quick process minimizes this strain and preserves enterprise value. In addition, the fact that an auction will occur on a specified date usually brings all truly interested and qualified parties to the table and quickly flushes out the tire-kickers. In our experience, this process tends to maximize the final value received.

Cost – Advisor fees consist of a retainer plus 10% or an agreed percentage of the sale proceeds. Legal fees are also minimized by the extremely simple deal terms. Fees, therefore, do not consume the entire value received for corporate assets.

Control – At all times, the board of directors retains complete control over the process. For example, the board of directors can modify the auction terms or even discontinue the auction at any point, thus preserving all options for as long as possible.

Public Relations – As the sale process is private, there is no public disclosure. Once closed, the transaction can be portrayed as a sale of the company with all sales terms kept confidential. Thus, for investors, the company can be listed in their portfolio as sold, not as having gone out of business.

Clean Exit – Once the auction is closed and the consideration is received and distributed, the advisor takes all remaining steps to effect an orderly shut-down of the remaining corporate entity. To this end the insolvency counsel then takes the lead on all orderly shutdown items.

Gerbsman Partners focuses on maximizing enterprise value for stakeholders and shareholders in under-performing, under-capitalized and under-valued companies and their Intellectual Property. Since 2001, Gerbsman Partners has been involved in maximizing value for 94 Technology, Medical Device, Mobile, Life Science, Cyber Security, Fuel Cell, Digital Marketing and Solar companies and their Intellectual Property and has restructured/terminated over $810 million of real estate executory contracts and equipment lease/sub-debt obligations. Since inception, Gerbsman Partners has been involved in over $2.3 billion of financings, restructurings and M&A transactions.

Gerbsman Partners has offices and strategic alliances in Boston, New York, Washington, DC, McLean, VA, San Francisco, Orange County, Europe and Israel.

 

gp_nl_footer
Steven R. Gerbsman
Principal
Gerbsman Partners
Cell: 415.505.4991
steve@gerbsmanpartners.com
http://www.gerbsmanpartners.com

Read Full Post »

 

gp_nl_header
San Francisco, August, 2016
Successful “Date Certain M&A” of Uptake Medical, Inc. its Assets and Intellectual Property – Gerbsman Partners, Financial Advisor
Steven R. Gerbsman, Principal of Gerbsman Partners, Kenneth Hardesty and Dennis Sholl Members of Gerbsman Partners Board of Intellectual Capital announced today their success in maximizing stakeholder value for Uptake Medical, Inc. Uptake Medical, Inc. focused on developing innovative, therapeutic bronchoscopic devices to treat advanced heterogeneous emphysema and lung cancer.

Gerbsman Partners provided Financial Advisory leadership to Uptake Medical, Inc., through its proprietary Date Certain M&A Process, facilitated the sale of the business unit’s assets and its associated Intellectual Property and closing of the sale. Due to market conditions, the board of directors of Uptake Medical, Inc. made the strategic decision to maximize the value of the business unit and Intellectual Property. Gerbsman Partners provided leadership to the company with:

  1.  Business Consulting and Investment Banking domain expertise in developing the strategic action plans for maximizing value of the business unit, Intellectual Property and assets;
  2. Proven domain expertise in maximizing the value of the business unit and Intellectual Property through a Gerbsman Partners targeted and proprietary “Date Certain M&A Process”;
  3. The ability to “Manage the Process” among potential Acquirers, Lawyers, Creditors Management and Advisors;
  4. Communications with the Board of Directors, senior management, senior lenders, creditors, vendors and all stakeholders in interest.

About Gerbsman Partners

Gerbsman Partners focuses on maximizing enterprise value for stakeholders and shareholders in under-performing, under-capitalized and under-valued companies and their Intellectual Property. Since 2001, Gerbsman Partners has been involved in maximizing value for 94 Technology, Medical Device, Life Science, Mobile, Solar, Fuel Cell and Digital Marketing companies and their Intellectual Property and has restructured/terminated over $810 million of real estate executory contracts and equipment lease/sub-debt obligations. Since inception in 1980, Gerbsman Partners has been involved in over $2.3 billion of financings, restructurings and M&A transactions.

Gerbsman Partners has offices and strategic alliances in San Francisco, Orange County, Boston, New York, Washington, DC, McLean, VA, Europe and Israel.

GERBSMAN PARTNERS
Phone: +1.415.456.0628, Cell: +1 415 505 4991
Email: steve@gerbsmanpartners.com
Web: www.gerbsmanpartners.com
BLOG of Intellectual Capital: blog.gerbsmanpartners.com

Read Full Post »

gp_nl_header-1

San Francisco, July, 2016
Successful “Date Certain M&A” of Palmaz Scientific, Inc. its Assets and Intellectual Property to Vactronix Scientific, Inc. – Gerbsman Partners, Financial Advisor
Steven R. Gerbsman, Principal of Gerbsman Partners, Kenneth Hardesty and Dennis Sholl Members of Gerbsman Partners Board of Intellectual Capital announced today their success in maximizing stakeholder value for Palmaz Scientific, Inc. through a 363 Chapter 11 sale to Vactronix Scientific, Inc. Palmaz Scientific Inc., focused on disruptive technology platforms which will change the medical device industry by creating unique ways of designing and developing medical implants.

Gerbsman Partners provided Financial Advisory leadership to Palmaz Scientific, Inc., through the Chapter 11 and Date Certain M&A Process, facilitated the sale of the business unit’s assets and its associated Intellectual Property and closing of the sale. Due to market conditions, the board of directors of Palmaz Scientific, Inc. made the strategic decision to maximize the value of the business unit and Intellectual Property.   Gerbsman Partners provided leadership to the company with:

  1.  Business Consulting and Investment Banking domain expertise in developing the strategic action plans for maximizing value of the business unit, Intellectual Property and assets;
  2. Proven domain expertise in maximizing the value of the business unit and Intellectual Property through a Gerbsman Partners targeted and proprietary “Date Certain M&A Process”;
  3. The ability to “Manage the Process” among potential Acquirers, Lawyers, Creditors Management and Advisors and the Chapter 11 process;
  4. Communications with the Board of Directors, senior management, senior lenders, creditors, vendors and all stakeholders in interest.

About Gerbsman Partners -Gerbsman Partners focuses on maximizing enterprise value for stakeholders and shareholders in under-performing, under-capitalized and under-valued companies and their Intellectual Property. Since 2001, Gerbsman Partners has been involved in maximizing value for 93 Technology, Medical Device, Life Science, Solar, Fuel Cell and Digital Marketing companies and their Intellectual Property and has restructured/terminated over $810 million of real estate executory contracts and equipment lease/sub-debt obligations. Since inception in 1980, Gerbsman Partners has been involved in over $2.3 billion of financings, restructurings and M&A transactions.

Gerbsman Partners has offices and strategic alliances in San Francisco, Orange County, Boston, New York, Washington, DC, McLean, VA, Europe and Israel.

GERBSMAN PARTNERS
Phone: +1.415.456.0628, Cell: +1 415 505 4991
Email: steve@gerbsmanpartners.com
Web: www.gerbsmanpartners.com
BLOG of Intellectual Capital: blog.gerbsmanpartners.com

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »