Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

PING Golf Clubs
I think all Americans should be aware of this. According to snopes.com this story is true.
THANK YOU, PING

Unknown

This isn’t a joke or cartoon; just something interesting to know . . . You may want to forward this on to others.

On Monday, I played the Disney, Lake Buena Vista course. As usual the starters matched me with three other players. After a few holes we began to get to know each other a bit. One fellow was rather young and had his wife riding along in the golf cart with him. I noticed that his golf bag had his name on it and after closer inspection it also said “wounded war veterans”. When I had my first chance to chat with him I asked him about the bag.
His response was simply that it was a gift. I then asked if he was wounded and he said yes. When I asked more about his injury, his response was “I’d rather not talk about it, sir”.

Over a few holes I learned that he had spent the last 15 months in an army rehabilitation hospital in San Antonio Texas . His wife moved there to be with him and he was released from the hospital in September. He was a rather quiet fellow; however, he did say that he wanted to get good at golf. We had a nice round and as we became a bit more familiar I asked him about the brand new set of Ping woods and irons he was playing. Some looked like they had never been hit. His response was simple. He said that this round was the first full round he had played with these clubs.

Later in the round he told me the following. As part of the discharge process from the rehabilitation hospital, Ping comes in and provides three days of golf instruction, followed by club fitting. Upon discharge from the hospital, Ping gives each of the discharged veterans, generally about 40 soldiers, a brand new set of custom fitted clubs along with the impressive golf bags.

The fellow I met was named Ben Woods and he looked me in the eye and said that being fitted for those clubs was one of the best things that ever happened to him and he was determined to learn to play golf well enough to deserve the gift Ping had given him. Ben is now out of the service medically discharged just a month ago. He is as fine a young man as you would ever want to meet.

Ping, whose products are made with pride here in America ( Arizona ), has the good judgment not to advertise this program. God Bless America and the game of golf.
Thank you PING !!!

May God Bless our Military!!!

This one deserves to be shared with everybody!!!!!!

=

Read Full Post »

Silicon Valley Venture Survey – Fourth Quarter 2013

February 18, 2014

Background
We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 124 companies headquartered in Silicon Valley that reported raising money in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Overview of Fenwick & West Results
Valuation results in 4Q13 continued strong, although not quite as strong as 3Q13.

Here are the more detailed results:

  • Up rounds exceeded down rounds 71% to 16%, with 13% of rounds flat. This was slightly less strong than 3Q13 when 73% of rounds were up, 8% down and 19% flat.
  • The Fenwick & West Venture Capital Barometer™ showed an average price increase of 57% in 4Q13, again a small decline from 65% in 3Q13.
  • The median price increase of financings in 4Q13 was 27%, a healthy result but a decline from the 43% registered in 3Q13.
  • While internet and digital media continued to be the strongest industries valuation wise, the percentage of financings from the life science industry was the highest (24.5%) since 2Q11. Additionally, software and internet digital media only combined for 50% of all financings, the lowest amount since 1Q12. As life science financings have not performed as well as software and internet digital media financings from a valuation perspective, this shift in mix was the major reason for the slightly less strong overall valuation results.

The more detailed results are below.

Overview of Other Industry Data
The overall venture environment continued to improve in 4Q13, and 2013 overall, but M&A activity and VC fundraising lagged.

  • Venture investing was strong in 4Q13, and 2013 was generally stronger than 2012, but lagged 2011. Software and internet investing was especially strong in 2013.
  • IPOs were strong in both 4Q13 and 2013, with 2013 seeing the most venture backed IPOs since 2007.
  • M&A in 4Q13 was mixed but declined in 2013 overall. 2013 saw the lowest number of venture backed M&A since 2009.
  • Venture firm fundraising improved in 4Q13 but declined in 2013, which was the lowest fundraising year since 2010.
  • Corporate venture investing increased through the first nine months of 2013 and was on track to be the best year since 2001
  • Angel funding increased in 2013, but the number of companies funded by accelerators declined.
  • Venture capitalist sentiment continued to improve in 4Q13 reaching the highest level since 3Q07.
    • Venture Capital Investment
      Dow Jones VentureSource (“VentureSource”) reported a 9.9% increase in venture investment and an 11.8% increase in the number of venture financings from 3Q13 to 4Q13. Specifically, $8.9 billion was invested in 901 deals in 4Q13 compared to $8.1 billion invested in 806 deals in 3Q13 (as reported in October 2013).1 For the full year of 2013, $33.1 billion was raised in 3480 deals, a 1% increase in dollars but a 5% decline in number of deals from 2012. The PwC/NVCA MoneyTree™ Report based on data from Thomson Reuters (the “MoneyTree Report”) reported generally similar results. Specifically, it reported that $8.4 billion was invested in 1077 deals in 4Q13, a 7.6% increase in dollars and a 7.2% increase in deals from the $7.8 billion invested in 1005 deals in 3Q13 (as reported in October 2013).1 For the full year of 2013, $29.4 billion was reported invested in 3,995 deals, an increase of 7% in dollars and 4% in deals over 2012. Investments in internet and software companies reached their highest levels since 2001 and 2000, respectively.Andreessen Horowitz was the most active VC in 2013 with 81 deals.
    • IPO Activity
      There were 24 venture backed IPOs raising $5.3 billion in 4Q13, a slight decline in transactions from the 26 IPOs in 3Q13 but a substantial increase in dollars from the $2.7 billion raised in 3Q13 (as reported in October 2013)1, according to Thomson Reuters and the NVCA (“Thomson/NVCA”).There were 82 venture backed IPOs in 2013, the most since 2007, and the amount raised in 2013 ($11.2 billion) was also healthy, although less than 2012 due to the Facebook IPO.
      Number of Venture Backed IPOsEleven of the fourth quarter IPOs were in life sciences and 10 in IT. Six of the IPOs were from outside of the U.S., due in part to China based companies beginning to re-enter the U.S. IPO market after having little activity in recent years. However the few venture backed Chinese companies going public in the U.S. in 2013 was far less than the 40 that did so in 2010 according to the Venture Capital Journal. VentureSource reported similar IPO results.

      Despite the healthy IPO market, there does not appear to be the large scale “irrational exuberance” in the industry as there was in 1999 when there were over 350 tech IPOs. However those companies that did go public, and those that have gone public in recent years, generally traded up significantly in 2013. And with CB Insights reporting at least 26 private venture backed IT companies with valuations over $1 billion, 2014 is positioned to be another good year for venture backed IPOs.

      In November 2013, the Equity Capital Formation Task Force issued a report on some of the regulatory reasons why IPOs in the U.S. have declined over the past decade, and made suggestions for regulatory changes. The report focused on the problems caused by decimalization of trading and the resultant lack of aftermarket support for smaller public tech companies. The lack of small investment banks like the “Four Horsemen” of the 1990s (H&Q, Montgomery, Alex Brown, Robertson Stephens) is likely a related factor.

    • Merger and Acquisition Activity
      VentureSource reported a 24% increase in the amount paid in the acquisition of venture backed companies and a 4% increase in the number of acquisitions in 4Q13 compared to 3Q13. Specifically there were 115 acquisitions for $12.0 billion in 4Q13 compared to 111 deals for $9.7 billion in 3Q13 (as reported in October 2013).1For the full year 2013 the amount paid in acquisitions declined by 14.2%, and the number of acquisitions declined by 9.4%, from 2012. Specifically there were 413 acquisitions for $36.9 billion in 2013 compared to 456 acquisitions for $43 billion in 2012. Thomson/NVCA reported a decline in M&A, from 116 in 3Q13 to 81 transactions in 4Q13, a 30% decrease, and from 488 transactions in 2012 to 377 transactions in 2013, a 23% decrease and the lowest year since 2009.Number of Acquisitions of VC-Backed Companies

      Somewhat in contrast, EY reported that the global (public and private) technology M&A market for 3Q13 was very healthy, with a post dot-com bubble record $71.2 billion of disclosed value acquisitions, and a continued increase in the amount of cash and investment held by the top technology companies–up to $784 billion in 3Q13.

      Perhaps part of the reason for the apparent disparity between the public and private M&A markets is that the rebounding IPO market has provided private companies an alternative to acquisition, and perhaps raised their perception of what they are worth. Supporting this thesis, EY also reported that 45% of tech executives they interviewed expected a widening gap in valuation expectation between buyers and sellers, an increase from 18% just six months prior.

      Another trend noted by TechCrunch is that increasing numbers of public non-tech companies are interested in acquiring private tech companies, especially those in the same industry (e.g., real estate or retail). And a new start up, ExitRound, has been formed to be a matchmaker for M&A, helping to match buyers and sellers on a confidential basis, a tool that could be especially useful for public non-technology company acquirors.

      Of the top 50 VC backed U.S. tech exits each year since 2007, 42% of the companies were based in Silicon Valley and 65% of the aggregate valuation was attributable to Silicon Valley based companies, according to CB Insights.

  • Venture Capital Fundraising
    Venture capital fundraising increased 9% in dollars in 4Q13 compared to 3Q13 but declined 10% in dollars from 2012 to 2013 according to VentureSource. Fourteen venture firms raised a majority of all funds raised in 2013.Similarly, Thomson Reuters/NVCA reported that fundraising increased 20% from 3Q13 to 4Q13 ($4.1 billion to $4.9 billion) but declined 14% for the full year, from $19.5 billion in 2012 to $16.7 billion in 2013.Fundraising by VCs ($ Billions)The increased concentration of venture resources was also evidenced by the Venture Capital Journal’s report that while 360 U.S. venture capital funds invested over $4 million in 2007, only 221 did in 2013.

For additional information, please visit http://www.fenwick.com/publications/Pages/Silicon-Valley-Venture-Survey-Fourth-Quarter-2013.aspx?WT.mc_id=2013.Q4_VCS_BK

Read Full Post »

Comcast’s $45 Billion Purchase Of Time Warner Cable Is Trouble For Apple TV

Jay Yarow

comcasts-45-billion-purchase-of-time-warner-cable-is-trouble-for-apple-tv

Mike Nudelman/Business Insider

Apple May Have Just Acquired The Final Piece It Needs To Make A Killer Apple TV

A funny thing happened this week.
After years of rumors, speculation, and wishing, we got two solid reports that said Apple was really ready to launch a full-on TV product.

Both the Wall Street Journal, and Bloomberg said Apple was planning to release an Apple TV this year. Bloomberg predicted an April reveal, and the WSJ predicted a June reveal.

These reports followed Mark Gurman at 9to5Mac saying a new Apple TV was coming in the first half of the year. All three said Apple was revamping its little hockey puck TV box, not releasing a big screen TV.

The Journal and Bloomberg both said Apple was partnering with Time Warner Cable to deliver video content to users. Apple TV would add a nice layer of user interface to Time Warner’s video stream.

However, just hours after the reports broke, a much bigger story involving the TV industry hit. Comcast was planning to buy Time Warner Cable for $45 billion in an all-stock deal.

We don’t know what this means for Apple’s TV plans, but it sure looks like whatever Apple was planning will be thrown into flux.

The Comcast-Time Warner Cable deal won’t close for a while and Comcast shouldn’t have influence over Time Warner’s plans until the deal is officially closed. But who knows if Time Warner will want to dive into something as big as a partnership with Apple at the same time that it’s getting acquired.

Our guess is that in the short term whatever Apple was working on with Time Warner Cable should be safe. Time Warner has been in play for a while, so Apple must have been aware this could happen.

In the long run, things get a little fuzzier.

On the day that news broke that Apple was working with Time Warner Cable, UBS analyst Steven Milunovich put out a note on the news titled, “Attempt to Preempt Comcast in Set-Top Box.”

Milunovich says Comcast has an agreement with Cox to use its set-top platform. Presumably, when it owns Time Warner Cable, it’s going to push those customers to use its platform. That would mean the three biggest cable companies, or ~35 million subscribers, will be using Comcast’s set top box.

Milunovich says that Comcast has been aggressively investing in its own set-top box platform, called “X1”:

“Today’s X1 features include voice-based navigation and search, personalized recommendations, a collection of customizable widgets, and access to third-party apps such as Facebook, Twitter, and Pandora. Internally referred to as X2, Comcast is in the midst of migrating its X1 users to a next-gen cloud-based device. This upgrade provides cloud-based DVR, mobile device synchronization, and app airplay capabilities.”

This makes it sound like Comcast would not want to hand over its video signal to Apple. It sounds like it thinks it can build a better TV experience.

It’s possible Apple makes something so great Comcast decides to drop its own platform, but we doubt it. It looks like when Comcast buys Time Warner Cable, Apple will have one less partner for trying to crack the TV market.

And this is the problem for Apple. Breaking into the TV market is tough because it’s a messy industry. It’s fractured, but the power is still in a few hands.

As Steve Jobs said in 2010, you can give consumers a box, but then it’s just another box on top of a box. “You end up with a table full of remotes, cluster full of boxes, bunch of UIs.”

Here’s the full quote from Jobs in 2010, which remains the best explanation of why Apple has struggled to crack TV:

“The problem with innovation in the television industry is the go to market strategy.

The television industry fundamentally has a subsidized business model that gives everybody a set top box for free, or for $10 a month. And that pretty much squashes innovation because no one is willing to buy a set top box.

Ask TiVo. Ask Replay TV. Ask Roku, ask Vudu, ask us, ask Google in a few months. Sony’s tried, Panasonic’s tried, we’ve all tried. So, all you can do is add a box onto the TV system.

You can say … I’ll add another little box with another one. You end up with a table full of remotes, cluster full of boxes, bunch of UIs.

The only way that’s ever gonna change is if you really go back toy square one and you tear up the set top box and design it with a consistent UI and deliver it to the customer in a way they’re willing to pay for it.

Right now there’s no way to do that. So that’s the problem with the TV market.

We decided, do we want a better tv or a better phone? The phone won out because there was no way to get it to market. What do we want more? A better tablet or a better tv? Well, probably a better tablet. But it doesn’t matter because there’s no way to get a tv to market. The TV is going to lose until there is a viable go to market strategy, otherwise you’re just making another TiVo.

That make sense?

It’s not a problem of technology, it’s not a problem of vision, it’s a fundamental go-to-market problem.

There isn’t a cable operator that’s national, there’s a bunch of operators. And it’s not like there’s GSM, where you build a phone and it works in all these other countries. No every single country has different standards. It’s very ‘tower of babble-is’, not that’s not the right word. Balkanized. I’m sure smarter people than us will figure this out. But when we say Apple TV is a hobby, that’s why we use that phrase. ”

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/apple-tv-comcast-time-warner-2014-2#ixzz2tbLU2M89

Read Full Post »

Check this out – An oldie but definitely a goodie.

http://yeli.us/Flash/Fire.html

Read Full Post »

SALE OF GLUMETRICS, INC.

Gerbsman Partners (www.gerbsmanpartners.com) has been retained by GluMetrics, Inc. (www.GluMetrics.com) to solicit interest for the acquisition of all, or substantially all, the assets of GluMetrics, Inc.

Based in Irvine, CA, GluMetrics, Inc. is a glucose monitoring medical device company, founded in 2005 with a patented, optical fluorescence, continuous, non-consumptive, real-time glucose sensing technology with the potential to materially impact both the hospital-based and diabetic glucose monitoring markets.

The Company has raised in four (4) rounds of venture capital financing over $57M, from Versant Ventures, ATV (Advanced Technology Ventures), Kaiser Permanente Venture Group, New Leaf Partners and private investors.

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE:

The information in this memorandum does not constitute the whole or any part of an offer or a contract.

The information contained in this memorandum relating to GluMetrics’ Assets has been supplied by GluMetrics.  It has not been independently investigated or verified by Gerbsman Partners or its agents.

Potential purchasers should not rely on any information contained in this memorandum or provided by GluMetrics, or Gerbsman Partners (or their respective staff, agents, and attorneys) in connection herewith, whether transmitted orally or in writing as a statement, opinion, or representation of fact. Interested parties should satisfy themselves through independent investigations as they or their legal and financial advisors see fit.

GluMetrics, Gerbsman Partners, and their respective staff, agents, and attorneys, (i) disclaim any and all implied warranties concerning the truth, accuracy, and completeness of any information provided in connection herewith and (ii) do not accept liability for the information, including that contained in this memorandum, whether that liability arises by reasons of GluMetrics’ or Gerbsman Partners’ negligence or otherwise.

Any sale of the GluMetrics Assets will be made on an “as-is,” “where-is,” and “with all faults” basis, without any warranties, representations, or guarantees, either express or implied, of any kind, nature, or type whatsoever from, or on behalf of GluMetrics or Gerbsman Partners.  Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, GluMetrics and Gerbsman Partners and their respective staff, agents, and attorneys,  hereby expressly disclaim any and all implied warranties concerning the condition of the GluMetrics Assets and any portions thereof, including, but not limited to, environmental conditions, compliance with any government regulations or requirements, the implied warranties of habitability, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose.

This memorandum contains confidential information and is not to be supplied to any person without Gerbsman Partners’ prior consent.  This memorandum and the information contained herein are subject to the non-disclosure agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A.

GluMetrics, Inc. is a medical technology company that has developed the patented GluCath® Intravascular Continuous Glucose Monitoring (IV-CGM) System (referred to as the“GluCath System”).  The system consists of (i) a fiber-optic based, single-use, disposable sensor that is inserted into either an artery or vein using standard vascular accesstechniques and (ii) a portable battery-powered monitor. The GluCath sensors leverage a proprietary chemistry which changes its fluorescence in proportion to the surrounding glucose concentration.

GluMetrics was focused initially on applying its proprietary technology to inpatient continuous glucose monitoring, a market that could exceed $1.4 billion globally, concentrating solelyon specific critically ill patient segments in the surgical, cardiac and medical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Significant and successful clinical testing was completed using the first product embodiment in hospitalized, post surgical patients in the US and abroad. The impressive results of this data speak to a significantly de-risked core measurement engine. The Companybelieves that an additional $800 million of upside opportunities exist in the hospital by expanding from the initial core ICU market to general surgeries and the general ward.

With the first commercially viable non-enzymatic sensor technology, the Company also believes that it could exploit the existing outpatient continuous glucose monitoring marketconsisting of three million people with Type 1 diabetes and the need for improved sensor technologies to support safe and effective insulin pump therapy, including the elusive “closedloop” insulin delivery system. Healthy human volunteer studies in diabetics were also completed which helped further confirm the utility and performance of the measurement engine in subcutaneous placements.

GluMetrics believes its assets are attractive for a number of reasons:

Technology “De-risked” with Clinically Proven Success

GluMetrics has completed design, development and clinical testing of its continuous, real-time, non-consumptive, fluorescent glucose measurement technology, which included extensivein-vitro testing and design verification activities. The technology, successfully deployed in the hospital ICU setting, is easily inserted via an existing radial artery cannula, stable requiring only one calibration/day, with exceptional accuracy in the hypo- and euglycemic ranges.

The Technology is Applicable for Numerous Applications

The core chemistry, hydrogel and optical system are configurable for other applications, including CGM for the diabetic population. In addition, potential applications such as for bioreactors and other laboratory measurements are straightforward developments, based on the existing measurement engine.

The Intellectual Property Portfolio is Diverse and Impressive

Twenty-five (25) issued US Patients and Foreign Counterpatents cover the core technology with an additional Twenty-two (22) pending US or PCT patent applications, with Claims that are extremely broad and diverse covering both the intravascular and subcutaneous realms (see Appendix for details).

Well Documented, Repeatable Manufacturing and Quality Procedures

The GluMetrics dye-quencher chemistry, hydrogel and monitors have been manufactured under the Company’s Quality System. The processes incorporated have resulted in repeatable and reliable devices for the uses intended, and are thoroughly documented, including all product and raw materials specifications, manufacturing and inspection processes.

GluMetrics Company Profile and Funding History

GluMetrics, Inc. was incorporated on Jan. 1, 2005. Throughout the course of 2005, GluMetrics, Inc. raised just over $2.9M in series “A” and “AA” capital to fund recruitment, establish theOrange County, California headquarters and advance the development of the fundamental GluCath sensor chemistry.

In July 2006, GluMetrics purchased all assets, goodwill and intellectual property of TGC Research Ltd. from Diametrics Medical, Inc. (“Diametrics”).  All prior art, trade secrets andintellectual property (including seven issued patents still in force) relating to Diametrics’ previous fluorescence-based intravascular systems for blood constituent monitoring is nowexclusively owned by GluMetrics.  Following this transaction, TGC Research Ltd. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of GluMetrics, Inc.

Also in July 2006, the Company closed a $9M series “B” financing to further refine and validate the GluCath System in pre-clinical trials.  This series “B” round was co-led by VersantVentures (Newport Beach, CA) and Advanced Technology Ventures (Palo Alto, CA), with each firm participating at $4.5M.

In March 2008, GluMetrics secured a $3M venture debt financing through Silicon Valley Bank supporting operations through September/October of 2008.

In July 2008, the Company closed a $21M series “C” round financing to continue the development of the GluCath System and initiate clinical trials. This series “C” round was led by NewLeaf Venture Partners (Menlo Park, CA) with significant participation from series “B” investors.

In October 2010, GluMetrics secured $10M in bridge financing from existing investors to initiate clinical trials of an arterial sensor and support ongoing operations.

In March 2012, the Company secured $8M in new equity as part of a recapitalization.  These funds supported the expansion of clinical trials, including extended duration arterial andvenous deployments.

In January 2013, GluMetrics secured $5.6M in bridge financing from existing investors to complete its arterial and venous clinical trials through the second half of 2013.

Impact of Technology on the Market

The GluCath System is ideally positioned to become the clinician’s preferred solution to support glycemic measurement for both the in-hospital and diabetic markets for five primaryreasons:

1)      The GluMetrics fluorescent glucose sensing system is the first non-GOX sensor to be clinically validated in a meaningful multi-center trial with sub-10% MARD results.

2)      The ultimate flexibility and adaptability of the measurement engine will enable broad application across a diverse universe of clinical applications including hospital-based and diabetic patients.

3)      The GluCath sensor measures plasma glucose in flowing blood continuously and directly. Given the non-enzymatic method of measurement, the GluCath sensor is notsusceptible to the numerous interferences and limitations which have affected electrochemical sensors.

4)      The GluCath System is most accurate in the physiologic range where accuracy is paramount (i.e., in the euglycemic and hypoglycemic range).  Additionally, the GluCathSystem provides rapid user feedback on both directionality and rate of change.

5)      The GluCath monitor is configured in a portable, hand-held, battery powered format allowing for flexible and convenient monitoring across the continuum of care (i.e., Pre-op-OR-ICU-Step-Down-General Floor-Outpatient). The GluCath sensor is small enough to be inserted into the radial artery of the arm via a standard arterial catheter, while maintaining pressure monitoring and blood sampling capability.  The sensor can also be deployed directly into a vein using a splittable introducer, leaving only the sensorindwelling in the vessel. Alternatively, it is feasible to deploy the sensor through a central venous catheter or integrated into a novel vascular access device.

6)      The sensor physical size, optical path and chemistry are such that it can be configured for subcutaneous insertion and sensing

In contrast to the GluCath System, potentially competitive devices now known to be under development have significant disadvantages, including larger size, limited mobility, therequirement for unique flush/calibration solutions and greater user-complexity. Additionally, numerous physician interviews have described some of these competitive approaches asfundamentally lacking sufficient accuracy in the target range, algorithmically dropping points, missing glucose excursions, or being too slow to reflect changing blood glucose.

GluMetrics’ Assets

Scope Of GluMetrics’ Patent Coverage

In summary, GluMetrics has a strong patent portfolio, including 25 issued patents, 1 allowed and 21 pending patent applications, with priority in optical fiber-based equilibrium fluorescent glucose detection going back as early as December 2000, and patent terms extending past 2030.  Since licensing the core chemistry, GluMetrics has perfected its commercially valuable innovations in extensive patent filings.  Indeed, the GluMetrics’ patent portfolio creates a minefield for any competitor trying to commercialize an equilibrium, fluorescent glucose sensor, whether intravascular or subcutaneous, whether fluorescence lifetime or intensity, and whether critically ill or walking diabetic populations. (See Appendix for details)

In addition to the GluMetrics’ patent portfolio, the following are available:

·         Clinical and pre-clinical data

·         Design and test equipment used in the development and manufacture of the GluCath system

·         Product specifications, drawings, manufacturing, assembly and quality insurance documentation

·         Furniture, fixtures and tooling used to assemble and/or manufacture the system

·         Test procedures, reports and data supporting the system testing during design and development

The assets of GluMetrics will be sold in whole or in part (collectively, the “GluMetrics Assets”). The sale of these assets is being conducted with the cooperation of GluMetrics.  GluMetrics and its employees will be available to assist purchasers with due diligence and a prompt, efficient transition to new ownership.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, GluMetrics should not be contacted directly without the prior consent of Gerbsman Partners.

The Sale of the GluMetrics Assets is being conducted pursuant to a Resolution of the Board of Directors of GluMetrics, Inc. for the liquidation and dissolution of the company which was approved by unanimous consent of the Board on January 23, 2014. GluMetrics expects the sale of the GluMetrics Assets to be completed without any further vote or action by GluMetrics’ stockholders.

GluMetrics, Inc. Key Personnel

William Markle, President and CEO

With a 30 year career in high-tech medical devices focusing on the Critical Care marketplace (Baxter, Edwards Life Sciences, American Hospital Supply), Mr. Markle has most recentlybeen a senior member of two well-funded and successful medical device start-up companies:  Tensys Medical and Masimo Corp.  Bringing an emphasis on understanding and definingkey customer requirements, operationally building and directing successful marketing, clinical support and direct sales teams, Mr. Markle has a strong record of both successful fund-raising and visionary leadership in multiple “customer-facing” disciplines.  A graduate of Duke University (BSME) and Pepperdine (MBA), Mr. Markle provides a current and real-worldperspective to the creation of shareholder value within the medical device sector.

Stuart L Gallant, VP, Product Development

Mr. Gallant has been in medical device development and management for over 41 years with extensive experience in the design, development and marketing of cardiovascular, patientmonitoring and vital signs devices and systems.  Initiating his career with Medtronic, he has subsequently been a successful medical device entrepreneur involved with creating,managing and developing four prior medical device start-ups, including significant experience with venture- capital financed enterprises, in senior management and Board positions.Coupled with his technical and management background and education (BSEE, MSBME, MBA), Mr. Gallant holds twenty US issued patents in medical devices and nationallyrecognized professional certifications in financial planning (CFP®, ChFC®).

Tricia Zubke, Controller

Ms. Zubke has over 20 years’ experience in accounting, human resources, information technology and all aspects of office management.  Prior to joining GluMetrics, Inc. in 2005, Ms. Zubke worked for a privately-held real estate development company and a recruiting firm specializing in human resources executives.  Ms. Zubke obtained a Bachelor’s degree in business management from Concordia University, Irvine and is a licensed California real estate broker.

GluMetrics, Inc. Outside Board of Directors

·         Mike Carusi, General Partner, Advanced Technology Ventures, Palo Alto,, CA

·         Charles Warden, Managing Director, Versant Ventures, Menlo Park, CA

·         Sam E. Brasch, Director, Kaiser Permanente Ventures, Oakland, CA

·         John Alexander, Santa Cruz, CA

·         Tom Berryman, Laguna Beach, CA

The Bidding Process for Interested Buyers

Interested and qualified parties will be expected to sign a nondisclosure agreement (attached hereto as Exhibit A) to have access to key members of the management and intellectual capital teams and the due diligence “war room” documentation (the “Due Diligence Access”).  Each interested party, as a consequence of the Due Diligence Access granted to it, shall be deemed to acknowledge and represent (i) that it is bound by the bidding procedures described herein; (ii) that it has an opportunity to inspect and examine the GluMetrics Assets and to review all pertinent documents and information with respect thereto; (iii) that it is not relying upon any written or oral statements, representations, or warranties of GluMetrics, Inc., Gerbsman Partners, or their respective staff, agents, or attorneys; and (iv) all such documents and reports have been provided solely for the convenience of the interested party, and neither GluMetrics nor Gerbsman Partners (or their respective, staff, agents, or attorneys) makes any representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the same.

Following an initial round of due diligence, interested parties will be invited to participate with a sealed bid, for the acquisition of the GluMetrics Assets.  Sealed bids must be submitted so that the bid is actually received by Gerbsman Partners no later than March 7, 2014 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (the “Bid Deadline”) at GluMetrics’ office, located at 15375 Barranca Pkwy, Suite I-111, Irvine, CA  92618.  Please also email steve@gerbsmanpartners.com with any bid.

Bids should identify those assets being tendered for in a specific and identifiable way.  The attached GluMetrics fixed asset list may not be complete and Bidders interested in the GluMetrics Assets must submit a separate bid for such assets.  Be specific as to the assets desired.

Any person or other entity making a bid must be prepared to provide independent confirmation that they possess the financial resources to complete the purchase where applicable.  All bids must be accompanied by a refundable deposit check in the amount of $250,000 (payable to GluMetrics, Inc.).  The winning bidder will be notified within 3 business days after the Bid Deadline.  Non-successful bidders will have their deposit returned to them.

GluMetrics reserves the right to, in its sole discretion, accept or reject any bid, or withdraw any or all assets from sale.  Interested parties should understand that it is expected that the highest bid will be chosen as the winning bidder and bidders may not have the opportunity to improve their bids after submission.

GluMetrics will require the successful bidder to close within 7 business days.  Any or all of the assets of GluMetrics will be sold on an “as is, where is” basis, with no representation or warranties whatsoever.

All sales, transfer, and recording taxes, stamp taxes, or similar taxes, if any, relating to the sale of the GluMetrics Assets shall be the sole responsibility of the successful bidder and shall be paid to GluMetrics at the closing of each transaction.

For additional information, please see below and/or contact:

Steven R. Gerbsman

(415) 456-0628

steve@gerbsmanpartners.com           

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »