Feeds:
Posts
Comments

An SEC Rule Change Opens a New Era for Crowdfunding

A recent rule change will allow entrepreneurs seeking investors to reach a much broader audience.

By JONATHAN MEDVED

Potential investors will soon begin seeing opportunities pop up in their Facebook news feeds and in their email inboxes thanks to a major rule change from the Securities and Exchange Commission. In September, the agency removed the decades-old ban on public solicitation for private investments. This means private investments can now be marketed to the general public, which will allow entrepreneurs to reach a much broader audience than securities law used to allow.

The nascent crowdfunding market, which uses the Internet to pool small investments from many investors, stands to benefit significantly from this rule change. Right now, crowdfunding sites like Kickstarter and Indiegogo are not subject to securities laws because they allow people to give money to support projects and individual initiatives, not invest in them. In the roughly four years they’ve been in existence, these two sites have raised close to $1 billion in contributions for thousands of projects.

Startups and businesses have taken notice. They have begun to use similar online crowdfunding platforms—but to gather investments. And thanks in part to the SEC’s new rule, the equity crowdfunding market is poised for rapid growth over the next decade. Deloitte expects all forms of crowdfunding to hit $3 billion globally this year and to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 100% over the near term. Equity crowdfunding is expected to perform even better, with a compound annual growth rate of 114%, according to the crowdfunding advisory firm Massolution.

To be sure, the SEC’s change to Rule 506 doesn’t allow just anyone to invest. Only “accredited” investors—with a net worth of more than $1 million, or who earn at least $200,000 a year—can continue to participate in equity crowdfunding. The new rules require proof, whereas self-attestment sufficed previously. Many hope that the SEC will issue additional regulations that would let smaller investors get in on the action.

Meanwhile, accredited investors are responding. Equity crowdfunders for accredited investors—including FundersClub, Angelist, CircleUp and my company, OurCrowd—are bringing in tens of millions of dollars for private investments through online platforms. And now that the SEC has removed restrictions on the companies’ public advertising, sites will at last be able to speak directly to customers.

The resources that might be tapped are staggering. The Royal Bank of Canada estimates that more than $45 trillion of capital sits in the pockets of high-net-worth individuals world-wide. Roughly $10 trillion is held by about five million U.S. households, according to the private-equity firm Carlyle estimates. Without public solicitation or Web-based crowdfunding portals, there was no way to reach beyond a small percentage of investors.

This money wants to move. According to April’s Northern Trust survey of high-net-worth investors, more than half of them are actively seeking new investments. And 30% are more inclined to consider alternative investments than they were five years ago.

A new class of angel investors, affluent individuals who invest personal funds in companies, is another byproduct of the burgeoning crowdfunding movement. These angel investors are no longer just former startup founders. They’re a younger, broader class of Internet-savvy investors ready to evaluate and pick deals online.

Managing these new angels will require “venture education.” Some crowdfunders post numerous deals and rely on the wisdom of the crowd to weed out the bad ones. Other platforms offer limited options to maintain credibility with potential investors. This presents some challenges for sound portfolio management. Should angels invest in multiple private deals to spread out risk and retain enough capital to cover losses? Those running crowdfunding platforms will need to give advice and support to angels to help them avoid taking big losses on one or two opportunities.

Professional investors know that they must provide value to companies beyond the capital they invest. Inexperienced angel investors may be less aware of that obligation. The equity crowdfunding portals will need to facilitate investor involvement. Investors have to find ways to sit on boards and become mentors to help companies handle growth, hire the right people and make good strategic decisions.

The crowdfunding model allows investing to move beyond Silicon Valley and Wall Street to Main Street. The next generation of angels is likely to include successful doctors, lawyers, contractors and real-estate professionals who want their share of the next Apple or Microsoft. The real question is if government regulation can continue to keep up with this rapid innovation.

Mr. Medved is the CEO of OurCrowd, an equity-based crowdfunding platform based in Israel.
A version of this article appeared October 9, 2013, on page A17 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: An SEC Rule Change Opens a New Era for Crowdfunding.

Unknown

Good afternoon

“Style Bible- What to Wear to Work” – is now available after almost two years of commitment by Lauren, to write a practical and realistic fashion guide for woman, men, graduates, professionals and the average person.

http://styleauteur.com

http://facebook.com/styleauteur

Buy the Book at Amazon.com – click here

This is the “perfect”  fashion guide, as first impressions (and second ones!) count, whether you are an intern or a CEO.  Lauren A. Rothman addresses an age-old dilemma: how to be appropriate and stylish in the workplace. Based on a decade of experience in the fashion industry, she addresses the basics of fashion and executive presence by offering advice, anecdotes, and style alerts that help readers avoid major fashion faux pas at the office. Style Bible: What to Wear to Work is the must-have resource for the modern professional, male or female, climbing the ladder of success. Lauren identifies the ultimate wardrobe essentials, and reveals shopping strategies and destinations for the everyday person. Style Bible, complete with helpful illustrations,is the go-to manual on how to dress for every professional occasion and a valuable resource for understanding dress codes by industry, city, and gender so that your visual cues will make a strong impact. Make a commitment to being better dressed at work with Style Bible.

Please visit Styleauteur’s website, Facebook page and Amazon.com, where you can buy the book.  It would be great if you would “like: Lauren on Facebook and if so inclined after you “buy” the book, write a review on Amazon.

Thanks for taking the time to review- and by the way – “buy the book”, its good.

Unknown-1

About Lauren Anne Rothman – Styleauteur

au·teur
noun, an artist (as a musician or writer) whose style and practice are distinctive –Merriam Webster Dictionary

Lauren A. Rothman, also known as the Styleauteur, is a fashion, style, and trend expert. Lauren has her finger on the pulse of fashion—from shopping closets across the country to discussing executive presence, political style, and First Family fashions on Entertainment Tonight, CNN, E! News, The Insider, AP News, Reuters, and ABC News. She is greatly sought after as a stylist, and her tips on wardrobe management and creating a versatile, fashion-forward closet have been featured in Glamour, Real Simple, People StyleWatch, The Washington Post, The New York Post, Politico, as well as on NPR, and XM/Sirius radio. Lauren writes a column, Fashion Whip, for The Huffington Post, on style and politics, and maintains an image therapy practice working with individual and corporate clients to help increase their style quotient. She got her start as an intern at Elle Magazine and her wide-ranging experience includes positions as a cool hunter at Faith Popcorn’s BrainReserve, and a personal shopper at Nordstrom and Saks Fifth Avenue.

San Francisco, October, 2013

Intellectual Property/Patent Acquisition Opportunity from Bell & Howell

As part of Gerbsman Partners (http://gerbsmanpartners.com) focus for maximizing value of Intellectual Property, I am attaching for your review and potential interest, two Patents for acquisition from the owner, Bell & Howell, LLC (http://bellhowell.net).  The Patents (US Patent Nos. 6,157,924 and 6,701,315, see attached) cover the same technology, which enables users to select and manage his/her preferences for receiving information from a business.

Bids for the sale of the patents will be due on November 8, 2013 and will be subject to “The Bidding Process” which will be forwarded in a separate email.

Patents (US Patent Nos. 6,157,924 and 6,701,315
Title:     Systems, Methods, and Computer Program Products for Delivering Information in a Preferred Medium  (US Patent Nos. 6,157,924 and   6,701,315)

Inventor: Pamela Sue Austin

Assignee/Owner: Bell and Howell, LLC

Abstract: The ‘924 Patent and the ‘315 Patents relate to data processing systems, methods and computer program products for delivering information in medium (or media) as selected by a customer (“user”) of a business.

Description: The ‘924 Patent and the ‘315 Patents cover the same technology. The technology enables a user to select and manage his/her preference for receiving information from a business.  The user can pick one or more communication methods for delivery, including methods such as printed material,  e-mail, HTML (browser readable), FAX, or any other method.  The solution works by allowing a user to set up a profile in a preference management system with the information provider which reflects his preference. The system will automatically reformat the information, for each user that setup a profile, to be able to deliver via the preferred delivery method.  In addition, the integrity of information delivered to a user is verified to ensure a record of delivery is available.

Innovation: The invention allows a business to deliver information and messages via one or many messaging formats based on the preference of each individual user.  In a nutshell, it allows a business to provide the information a user wants, how they want it.

Advantages: Alternative messaging via print and electronic mediums has become necessary for businesses to stay competitive, be able to satisfy customer preferences, and stay current with emerging technologies. The invention facilitates alternative messaging between businesses and a user wherein a variety of delivery media can be utilized to communicate information.

Market Potential & Application Domain: The ‘924 Patent and ‘315 Patent are very attractive to any business delivering information or communications to its customers in multiple formats.  Potential market segments that could benefit from use of the invention include:

1.         Credit card companies (Billing, membership solicitations, special offers, etc)

2.         Travel companies (Airlines, travel agencies, etc)

3.         Music and book clubs

4.         Corporations (Annual and Quarterly reports, SEC documents, proxies, meeting announcements, etc)

5.         Banks (Statements, notifications, etc)

6.         Insurance companies (Statements, solicitations, etc.)

7.         Utilities (Statements, etc)

8.         Universities (Acceptances and rejections, fund raising solicitations, course listings, grades, statements, etc)

9.         Large charities (Museums, orchestras, religious charities, benefit organizers, etc)

10.      Retailers (Catalogs, special offers, credit card solicitations, etc)

11.      Professional societies (IEEE, APS, ACS, etc)

12.      Political parties

13.      The US and state governments

14.      United States Postal Service

Technological Key Words: Alternative messaging; preference and enrollment database

Market Key Words: Alternative messaging; one-to-one marketing, multi-channel messaging, electronic delivery, EBPP

About Bell and Howell, LLC

Bell and Howell is a leading global provider of multi-channel communications solutions, providing messaging technologies for print, Web and mobile delivery.  They are dedicated to drive positive growth for their customers, and their suite of solutions are designed to be open, flexible, solve unique customer needs, and enable the highest quality and lowest cost production of highly relevant customer communications. Supporting these solutions is one of the largest dedicated service organizations in the industry. Headquartered in Research Triangle Park, N.C., the company maintains development and manufacturing facilities in Wheeling, Ill., Bethlehem, Pa., Rochester, N.Y., Dallas, Texas, and Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. For further information, please visit http://www.bellhowell.net.

About Gerbsman Partners

Gerbsman Partners is a private investment bank focused on maximizing value for stakeholders of Intellectual Property companies.  Gerbsman Partners and its Board of Intellectual Capital has helped maximize Intellectual Property stakeholder value for 79 technology, medical device, digital marketing, social commerce, life science and solar companies through our proprietary “Date Certain M&A Process” and has restructured/terminated over $ 810 million of prohibitive real estate and equipment leases, sub-debt and creditor issues. Since 1980, Gerbsman Partners has been involved in over $ 2.3 M&A, financing and restructuring transactions.

If you have any interest in the acquisition of these Patents, please call:

Steven R. Gerbsman (415) 505 4991 steve@gerbsmanpartners.com

Kenneth Hardesty (408) 591 7528 ken@gerbsmanpartners.com

What (not) to wear at work

September 26, 2013: 1:16 PM ET

Ever since grunge-garbed tech heroes captured the zeitgeist, confusion has reigned over corporate dress codes. But it’s smart not to take “casual” too far.

130926124930-office-inappropriate-620xa

FORTUNE — Dear Annie: Please settle an argument. I work with a brand-management team of about 20, some of whom I really think take the notion of “business casual” clothing a few steps over the line. The question is, where is the line? I say acid-washed jeans (with holes), yoga pants, and tank tops just don’t belong in the office. Not that everyone has to go back to the old days of wearing suits and ties all the time, God forbid, but it doesn’t help a person’s career prospects if they look like they just rolled out of bed, either.

Several of my coworkers, who show up wearing all kinds of strange and sloppy things, disagree. Their argument is two-fold: First, if your work is really topnotch, it doesn’t matter what you wear, you’re still a star. And second, if Mark Zuckerberg can show up on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange for Facebook’s (FB) IPO wearing jeans and a hoodie, it proves there are no more rules about clothes. What do you say? — Fashion Fan

Dear F.F.: Interesting question. Slowly, over the past 15 years or so, startups’ lack of office dress code has permeated the work world. “It started with ‘casual Fridays’ and devolved from there,” says Lauren A. Rothman, author of a new book called Style Bible: What to Wear to Work.

Rothman is a longtime professional fashionista whose consulting firm, Styleauteur, runs dress-for-success seminars at Fortune 500 companies and elsewhere. She’s frequently called in to coach individual executives on sprucing up their personal style. “For instance, I’ve had law firms and major accounting firms call me and say, ‘Can you work with So-and-So? He’s not going to make partner until he starts looking like one,'” she says.

MORE: Wall Street is ignoring Washington, finally!

There’s a reason for that: “We’d all love to believe appearances don’t matter, but the reality is, packaging counts. What you wear is part of your overall personal brand, your professional image. If you want to move up in your career at almost any big company, you have to look the part. The old adage ‘dress for the job you want, not the job you have’ is still true.”

In other words, if your boss and other higher-ups aren’t coming to work in acid-washed jeans and tank tops, your colleagues might want to take the hint. And as for what Mark Zuckerberg wears, unless your coworkers also happen to be self-made billionaires, how relevant is that?

Some uncertainty over how to dress for work springs from the fact that, although many companies do still have actual dress codes — which tend to vary a lot from one industry, and one region of the country, to another — “managers at most businesses don’t do a great job of communicating what is expected, or what image the company wants employees to project,” Rothman notes. “It’s hard to hold people to a standard if you haven’t told them what the standard is. Nevertheless, most employers do want you to dress differently than you would if you were just hanging out at home.”

In practical terms, that means that, for anyone who wears jeans to the office, “a professional look is still a good idea. Not just any old jeans will do,” Rothman says, adding that office denim should be a dark wash, hemmed so they just brush the tops of your shoes, “not fashionably dragging on the floor, and free of rips, whiskering, or anything else that marks them as overly trendy, or old. Look for trouser-style jeans whose cut resembles dressier pants.”

Style Bible goes into lots of lively detail about how to put together a work wardrobe, depending on your job, your budget, and where you live. In general, Rothman says that some mistakes women make revolve around “the sexiness factor — wearing too-short skirts, too-high heels, or too much makeup.” For men, she’s most often called upon to help address sloppiness, including “stained or wrinkled clothes, or clothes that don’t fit properly.”

Your coworkers who think clothes don’t matter might want to consider a couple of further thoughts. First, Rothman notes that advancing a career these days depends in large part on networking. So “even if you believe that the quality of your work should speak for itself, what about the way you come across to people who aren’t yet familiar with how good your work is?” she says. “If you’re going to networking events, people there are forming first impressions of you based in part on how professional you look.” Until they’ve gotten to know you, they have little else to go on, so it’s smart to make sure your style isn’t getting in the way.

MORE: Fraud detection approaches its ‘Minority Report’ moment

And second, Rothman suggests that those who doubt that clothes matter conduct a small experiment: “Just try dressing more professionally for a week, or a month. Most of us feel more confident and more competent when we dress well. You may even find that other people respond to you differently. It can be hard to command attention and respect when you look as if you just don’t care.

“You have to get dressed every day anyway — you can’t go to work naked,” she adds. “So why not try to make what you’re wearing work for you?” Why not, indeed.

Welcome To SUPER MAEVE!!

Maeve is in REMISSION – may God bless, protect and give her and family strength and courage

facebook.com/supermaeve

supermaeve.com

1238097_522472534512251_451081405_n-1

You know me by my everyday name, Maeve, but my true identity is Super Maeve. I am about to fight something that only one-in-a-million kids have; since I’m a one-in-a-million, superhero kind of girl, I’m going to kick cancer’s butt! Here’s the way you can follow my path to victory!

While playing on the playground on March 19, Maeve took a tumble and later began complaining that her stomach hurt. Vu and Megan took her to the doctor for a checkup. While the doctor was unable to find any apparent cause and thought it might be a stomach virus, she decided to send Maeve for further tests just to be safe.

After an ultrasound, it was discovered that Maeve had several tumors: a large tumor in her abdominal cavity, a tumor on and within her liver and several spots on her lungs. The doctors’ initial diagnosis was a rare form of Germ Cell Tumor, which was confirmed by biopsy on Tuesday, March 26. Maeve’s current treatment plan involves four rounds of inpatient chemotherapy, each lasting one week, to decrease the size of the tumors. In between those rounds, Maeve will have an opportunity to recover at home and receive blood transfusions when necessary. Following the fourth round of chemo, Maeve will have a CT scan and surgery to remove the tumors. Another two rounds of chemo will follow the surgery and hopefully seal the deal on removing this cancer from her body for good.

Initially, we expect her treatment to last anywhere from nine to 18 months depending on the speed and level of response the tumors have to the chemo. Once her cancer is in remission, doctors will continue to monitor her progress for the next five years